Knot4Prophet.com Forum https://forums.knot4prophet.com/ |
|
Knot4Prophet vs Severus & Grrrr re: Instinctual Morality https://forums.knot4prophet.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=100 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Knot4Prophet [ Thu May 08, 2008 10:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Knot4Prophet vs Severus & Grrrr re: Instinctual Morality |
An interesting discussion regarding the instiinctuality of morality came up in Debait recently, so I've included a log of the discussion, and added some final points at the end. Let me begin by saying that NO ONE can say with absolute certainty that morality is learned or instinctual. What we can do is look for and compare to human behaviours which are instinctual and derive from that a basis to extrapolate to other "moral" behaviours. The discussion began with Busta and Severus agreeing that all morality is learned. 05/08/08 02:39:29 <BUSTA> you are NOT born with morals or values 05/08/08 02:39:33 <BUSTA> you must learn both 05/08/08 02:39:37 <Severus379> of course 05/08/08 02:39:43 <BUSTA> they are simple things but you must be taught them 05/08/08 02:39:49 <Severus379> I know 05/08/08 02:39:52 <BUSTA> you can never BE EXSPECTED to know 05/08/08 02:39:59 <Severus379> of course not 05/08/08 02:40:16 <BUSTA> if you were born with morals and alues they wouldnt be so elastic across humans kind 05/08/08 02:40:31 <BUSTA> people make this mistake though 05/08/08 02:40:35 <BUSTA> they assume musch * * * 05/08/08 04:35:26 <Knot4Prophet> and i saw u and busta talking bout how morality is learned earlier, and i disagree 05/08/08 04:35:42 <Knot4Prophet> the closer that morality aligns with pure survival, the more it is instinctual 05/08/08 04:35:50 <Severus379> I know you think that 05/08/08 04:35:57 <Knot4Prophet> i can prove it 05/08/08 04:36:02 <Severus379> I still think there is only one universal moral 05/08/08 04:36:08 <Severus379> incest taboo 05/08/08 04:36:18 <Knot4Prophet> death = wrong, survive = right 05/08/08 04:36:18 <Severus379> all the others are rather flexible 05/08/08 04:36:22 <Knot4Prophet> that's morality 05/08/08 04:36:28 <Severus379> no it isn't 05/08/08 04:36:29 <Severus379> 05/08/08 04:36:30 <Knot4Prophet> yup 05/08/08 04:36:33 <Severus379> bit simple, that 05/08/08 04:36:37 <Knot4Prophet> all cultures agree about murder 05/08/08 04:36:45 <Knot4Prophet> they dont all agree about incest, to the same degree 05/08/08 04:36:59 <mickey572> what ? 05/08/08 04:37:04 <mickey572> incest ? 05/08/08 04:37:04 <Knot4Prophet> we all value life, cuz we're biological and main command to all biology = survive! 05/08/08 04:37:11 <mickey572> good grief 05/08/08 04:37:17 <Knot4Prophet> we have awareness, so we can identify with others 05/08/08 04:37:25 <Knot4Prophet> those are the requirements for instinctual morality 05/08/08 04:37:36 mickey572_27765 has left 05/08/08 04:37:36 <Knot4Prophet> awareness, biology and the command: survive! 05/08/08 04:37:51 <Severus379> it's not as simple as that though 05/08/08 04:37:56 <Knot4Prophet> oh but it is 05/08/08 04:37:57 <Severus379> it's kinda raw 05/08/08 04:38:11 <Knot4Prophet> i've worked it from first principles 05/08/08 04:38:16 <Severus379> hmmm 05/08/08 04:38:20 <Severus379> so have I 05/08/08 04:38:21 <Knot4Prophet> beginnging with a universe of one entity 05/08/08 04:38:25 <Knot4Prophet> and moving from there, to 2 05/08/08 04:38:28 <Knot4Prophet> when morality begins 05/08/08 04:38:40 <Severus379> when there are two 05/08/08 04:38:44 <Severus379> morality begins 05/08/08 04:38:47 <Knot4Prophet> if no one could kill/hurt anyone else, there would be no morality 05/08/08 04:38:49 <Knot4Prophet> right 05/08/08 04:38:58 <Severus379> or if no one WOULD 05/08/08 04:39:04 <Severus379> then we wouldn't know 05/08/08 04:39:08 <Knot4Prophet> so survival is a factor in morality 05/08/08 04:39:10 <Severus379> with killing, maybe 05/08/08 04:39:18 <Knot4Prophet> as are separate entities who live then die 05/08/08 04:39:19 <Severus379> survival is one factor, yes 05/08/08 04:39:31 <Severus379> but then, there is the altruistic suicide 05/08/08 04:39:35 <Severus379> highly moral 05/08/08 04:39:39 <Severus379> mass suicide 05/08/08 04:39:45 <Knot4Prophet> that's the basis for a soul 05/08/08 04:39:48 <Severus379> and they think they act upon moral 05/08/08 04:39:53 <Severus379> it isn't as easy 05/08/08 04:39:56 <Knot4Prophet> humans overcome biology's command to 'survive' 05/08/08 04:40:01 <Knot4Prophet> other biology doesn't 05/08/08 04:40:01 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 04:40:13 <Severus379> the definition of moral has also overcome that instinctt 05/08/08 04:40:16 <Severus379> just as humans have 05/08/08 04:40:18 <Severus379> simple 05/08/08 04:40:24 <Knot4Prophet> thats the basis for a "will" apart from the biology itself 05/08/08 04:40:31 <Knot4Prophet> which has its own will, "survive" 05/08/08 04:40:46 <BEAR> Just link her the essay 05/08/08 04:40:52 <V> Hey, Bear. 05/08/08 04:40:53 BEAR 999 just walked in 05/08/08 04:40:55 <BEAR> Hey, V 05/08/08 04:40:58 <Knot4Prophet> suicide sets the table for a will at cross purposes to biology 05/08/08 04:41:03 <BEAR> How ya doin, O.G? 05/08/08 04:41:10 <Knot4Prophet> for the feast of freedom? 05/08/08 04:41:14 <Knot4Prophet> stupid fucking metaphors 05/08/08 04:41:15 <BEAR> So no animals commit suicide? 05/08/08 04:41:18 <Knot4Prophet> rarely 05/08/08 04:41:19 <Relentless> bear!!!!! 05/08/08 04:41:21 <Knot4Prophet> not like we do 05/08/08 04:41:24 <BEAR> I disagree 05/08/08 04:41:26 <Severus379> QUOTE: humans overcome biology's command to 'survive' = humans can define moral in a way that has overcome this instinct 05/08/08 04:41:26 <Knot4Prophet> do u know of any? 05/08/08 04:41:28 <Knot4Prophet> list them 05/08/08 04:41:36 <BEAR> I've heard tell of animals that "give up" 05/08/08 04:41:49 <BEAR> Say when they are moved drastically or their owners perish 05/08/08 04:41:55 <BEAR> They stop eating 05/08/08 04:41:57 <Knot4Prophet> idk any that have 05/08/08 04:41:57 <Severus379> we are not talking animals 05/08/08 04:41:58 <BEAR> drinking 05/08/08 04:42:01 <Severus379> I was talking humans 05/08/08 04:42:02 <Knot4Prophet> not one 05/08/08 04:42:08 Relentless 258 is listening to Dancing DJs - Right Beside You 05/08/08 04:42:08 <Knot4Prophet> i just heard ppl say it, but idk any 05/08/08 04:42:13 <Severus379> yeah, and is that immoral? 05/08/08 04:42:13 <BEAR> Right 05/08/08 04:42:14 <Knot4Prophet> i know tons of ppl that committed suicide 05/08/08 04:42:15 <Knot4Prophet> do u? 05/08/08 04:42:16 <BEAR> i heard tell 05/08/08 04:42:17 <Severus379> stopping to drink? 05/08/08 04:42:22 <Knot4Prophet> i know them personally, i mean 05/08/08 04:42:26 <BEAR> Not "tons" but yeah 05/08/08 04:42:28 <Severus379> I knew one 05/08/08 04:42:30 <BEAR> Right 05/08/08 04:42:36 <Knot4Prophet> my godmother, in fact! 05/08/08 04:42:37 <V> Doing alright. 05/08/08 04:42:37 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 04:42:40 <BEAR> Good man 05/08/08 04:42:48 <Knot4Prophet> my fucking godmother committed suicide 05/08/08 04:42:49 <BEAR> How'd she go? 05/08/08 04:42:54 <Knot4Prophet> pills od'd 05/08/08 04:42:57 <BEAR> aye 05/08/08 04:42:58 <BEAR> fav. 05/08/08 04:42:59 <Knot4Prophet> left a note too, i believe 05/08/08 04:43:04 <BEAR> Wow.. bold 05/08/08 04:43:06 <Knot4Prophet> the details are murky 05/08/08 04:43:10 <BEAR> I dunno would you leave a note? 05/08/08 04:43:14 <Knot4Prophet> she was screwing around on husband with a black guy 05/08/08 04:43:16 <BEAR> I dunno if I would 05/08/08 04:43:21 <Knot4Prophet> and prolly wracked with guilt 05/08/08 04:43:22 <Knot4Prophet> idk 05/08/08 04:43:36 <BEAR> Oh hey I've been meaning to ask you, knot, about some documentaries 05/08/08 04:43:39 <Knot4Prophet> leave a note? nope 05/08/08 04:43:39 <BEAR> you a buff on them right? 05/08/08 04:43:40 <Severus379> was that immoral? 05/08/08 04:43:43 <Knot4Prophet> i wouldnt commit suicide 05/08/08 04:43:46 <BEAR> Right 05/08/08 04:43:55 <BEAR> I figured you'd say that 05/08/08 04:43:57 <Knot4Prophet> was what immoral, sev? 05/08/08 04:44:03 <Severus379> is suicide immoral? 05/08/08 04:44:05 <BEAR> Suicide? 05/08/08 04:44:07 <BEAR> Hell no 05/08/08 04:44:08 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 04:44:14 <Severus379> you see? 05/08/08 04:44:17 <Knot4Prophet> i dont think it is, no 05/08/08 04:44:23 <BEAR> I am certain it's not. 05/08/08 04:44:25 <Severus379> that survive thing can't be the basis of morality 05/08/08 04:44:26 <Knot4Prophet> its not hurting anyone but the biology 05/08/08 04:44:31 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> morality isn't about you 05/08/08 04:44:37 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 04:44:46 <Knot4Prophet> survival/death cycle is necessary for morality to exist 05/08/08 04:44:52 <Severus379> it's something that a certain group has in common 05/08/08 04:44:57 <BEAR> Anyone here ever heard of the documentary "Esoteric Agendas"? 05/08/08 04:45:07 <Severus379> morality is now independant from survive/death 05/08/08 04:45:09 <Knot4Prophet> and i cant link to the essay yet bear, cuz its not complete 05/08/08 04:45:11 <Severus379> not completely 05/08/08 04:45:14 <Severus379> but to a degree 05/08/08 04:45:18 <BEAR> ic 05/08/08 04:45:31 <Severus379> so there is more to morality than survivaö 05/08/08 04:45:31 <Knot4Prophet> those are just social mores, less related to survival 05/08/08 04:45:33 <Severus379> you said it 05/08/08 04:45:35 <BEAR> Want me to finish it? hehehe 05/08/08 04:45:40 <Knot4Prophet> ambiguous morality, i call it 05/08/08 04:45:47 <Knot4Prophet> when we're not sure if its 'good' or 'bad' 05/08/08 04:45:49 <Knot4Prophet> like drug use 05/08/08 04:45:57 <BEAR> Well 05/08/08 04:46:04 <Knot4Prophet> look across cultures and u'll c that its not consistent 05/08/08 04:46:04 <BEAR> how much does the drug hurt your biology 05/08/08 04:46:10 <Knot4Prophet> its ambiguous 05/08/08 04:46:17 <Knot4Prophet> whether drugs are 'good' or 'bad' 05/08/08 04:46:18 <BEAR> IE smack vs. tylenol 05/08/08 04:46:19 <Knot4Prophet> not murder. 05/08/08 04:46:27 Relentless 258 is listening to Music-Bashy - We Got Links 05/08/08 04:46:31 <Knot4Prophet> we instinctively know that killing is wrong 05/08/08 04:46:35 <BEAR> Some do 05/08/08 04:46:39 <Severus379> well, in WW2 murder was considered "moral" 05/08/08 04:46:42 <Knot4Prophet> most, bear 05/08/08 04:46:44 <BEAR> Small percentage don't 05/08/08 04:46:48 <Knot4Prophet> im talking 99.9% 05/08/08 04:46:48 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> it's not instinct 05/08/08 04:46:49 <Severus379> so it's not that either is it 05/08/08 04:46:52 <Knot4Prophet> i dont care bout the rest 05/08/08 04:46:59 <Knot4Prophet> u cannot prove its learned 05/08/08 04:47:00 <BEAR> well a mall fraction of a percentage don't 05/08/08 04:47:01 <BEAR> lol 05/08/08 04:47:06 <Severus379> this is not a probabilistic debate 05/08/08 04:47:06 <BEAR> *small 05/08/08 04:47:13 <Severus379> it cannot be 05/08/08 04:47:20 <BEAR> brb 05/08/08 04:47:21 <Severus379> it's deterministic 05/08/08 04:47:23 <BEAR> ren 05/08/08 04:47:25 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 04:47:26 <Severus379> ? 05/08/08 04:47:27 <BEAR> I would like you to know 05/08/08 04:47:32 <BEAR> I am about to take a massive shit 05/08/08 04:47:35 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 04:47:36 <BEAR> it may rip my asshole 05/08/08 04:47:38 <BEAR> brb 05/08/08 04:47:39 <Severus379> right 05/08/08 04:47:42 <Severus379> good to know 05/08/08 04:47:51 <Knot4Prophet> good ol free speech aye 05/08/08 04:47:59 Severus379_26658 has left 05/08/08 04:48:04 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 04:48:15 <Knot4Prophet> aw come back, silly girl 05/08/08 04:48:17 Severus379_26658 (78.52.226.28) (DSL 554 files) has entered 05/08/08 04:48:17 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] Severus : 78.52.226.28 : 17160 05/08/08 04:48:19 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 04:48:20 <Knot4Prophet> wb 05/08/08 04:48:22 <Severus379> thx 05/08/08 04:48:28 <Knot4Prophet> server drop u? 05/08/08 04:48:48 <choco_forever456> it was the smell of bear's poop 05/08/08 04:48:52 <Knot4Prophet> heh 05/08/08 04:49:01 <Knot4Prophet> brb coffee/nuke 05/08/08 04:49:18 <Severus379> nope 05/08/08 04:49:22 <Severus379> was deliberate 05/08/08 04:49:45 <Severus379> your coffees tak ages 05/08/08 04:49:47 <choco_forever456> to protest 05/08/08 04:49:52 <Severus379> no no 05/08/08 04:49:59 <Severus379> just didn't want that on the screen 05/08/08 04:50:02 <Severus379> lol+ 05/08/08 04:50:05 <choco_forever456> ren , where did you get that quote 05/08/08 04:50:08 <choco_forever456> humans overcome biology's command to 'survive' 05/08/08 04:50:11 <Severus379> what quote?? 05/08/08 04:50:19 Relentless 258 is listening to Soul II Soul - Back To Life 05/08/08 04:50:22 <Severus379> I didn't get that from anywhere 05/08/08 04:50:37 <Severus379> it was a logical conclusion from what knot said 05/08/08 04:50:45 <choco_forever456> you sais is a quote 05/08/08 04:50:49 <choco_forever456> 11:42:45 <Severus379> QUOTE: humans overcome biology's command to 'survive' = humans can define moral in a way that has overcome this instinct 05/08/08 04:50:54 <Severus379> oh 05/08/08 04:50:58 <Severus379> it's knots quote 05/08/08 04:51:00 <Severus379> you see? 05/08/08 04:51:05 <Severus379> I was just taking it further 05/08/08 04:51:26 <Severus379> and applied it to the moral thing 05/08/08 04:51:33 <choco_forever456> yes I saw 05/08/08 04:51:40 <Severus379> he said it cause I mentioned altruistic (moral) suicide 05/08/08 04:51:43 <Severus379> you see? 05/08/08 04:51:48 <Severus379> lke sacrificing 05/08/08 04:51:55 <Severus379> or mass suicide 05/08/08 04:51:55 <choco_forever456> I read that too 05/08/08 04:52:01 Relentless 258 is listening to Jayo Felony - Crip Anthem 05/08/08 04:52:14 <choco_forever456> yes but that sacrificing has the finality of saving others 05/08/08 04:52:19 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 04:52:23 <choco_forever456> so , survival again 05/08/08 04:52:24 <Severus379> so it is considered moral 05/08/08 04:52:33 <choco_forever456> survival of others 05/08/08 04:52:35 <Knot4Prophet> list any moral code that does not have at its root "survival" and i'll show u how its ambiguous morality 05/08/08 04:52:40 <Severus379> it isn't just for survival 05/08/08 04:52:42 <Severus379> is it? 05/08/08 04:52:43 <Knot4Prophet> name some 05/08/08 04:52:51 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> people who choose not to reproduce 05/08/08 04:52:55 <Knot4Prophet> list some morals that have nothing to do with surival 05/08/08 04:52:57 <Severus379> it could be for achieving happiness in the after life 05/08/08 04:53:01 <Severus379> that's not survival 05/08/08 04:53:08 Relentless 258 is listening to Jayo Felony - Gang bangin' shit 05/08/08 04:53:23 <Severus379> Okay knot 05/08/08 04:53:24 <Knot4Prophet> i dont distill that as instinctual morality 05/08/08 04:53:25 Severus379 thinks 05/08/08 04:53:27 <Knot4Prophet> as with murder 05/08/08 04:53:27 <Severus379> ouch 05/08/08 04:53:29 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 04:53:36 <Severus379> 05/08/08 04:53:37 <choco_forever456> survival of the soul then ;p 05/08/08 04:53:42 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 04:53:43 <Severus379> umpf 05/08/08 04:53:45 <Knot4Prophet> now ur thinkin 05/08/08 04:53:47 <Severus379> far fetched shit 05/08/08 04:53:49 <Severus379> haha 05/08/08 04:53:52 <choco_forever456> 05/08/08 04:53:52 Severus379 thinks again 05/08/08 04:53:56 <Knot4Prophet> so is life, far fetched 05/08/08 04:54:05 <Knot4Prophet> that we exist at all, is far fetched 05/08/08 04:54:05 <Severus379> now THAT is far fetched 05/08/08 04:54:09 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> most people don't murder because of consequence not instinc 05/08/08 04:54:09 <Knot4Prophet> do we see it anywhere else? 05/08/08 04:54:22 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> t 05/08/08 04:54:25 <Knot4Prophet> u cant prove that 05/08/08 04:54:29 <Severus379> artistic morals 05/08/08 04:54:31 Relentless 258 is listening to Jayo Felony - The Loc Is On His Own 05/08/08 04:54:32 <Knot4Prophet> i know y i dont murder 05/08/08 04:54:33 <Severus379> like copyright 05/08/08 04:54:38 <Knot4Prophet> and it aint cuz what u just said 05/08/08 04:54:41 <Severus379> how is that about survival? 05/08/08 04:54:46 <Knot4Prophet> y should i assume everyone else is different, grr? 05/08/08 04:54:51 <Knot4Prophet> is that y u dont kill? 05/08/08 04:54:57 <Knot4Prophet> cuz the consequences, only? 05/08/08 04:54:59 <Knot4Prophet> really? 05/08/08 04:55:03 <Knot4Prophet> i find that rather shocking 05/08/08 04:55:12 <Knot4Prophet> copyright is not moral, to me, sev 05/08/08 04:55:18 <Knot4Prophet> its nonsense 05/08/08 04:55:18 <Severus379> not to you 05/08/08 04:55:23 <Severus379> but to artists 05/08/08 04:55:25 <Knot4Prophet> its not instinctual morality 05/08/08 04:55:31 <Severus379> morals aren't the same for each group 05/08/08 04:55:32 <Knot4Prophet> its cultural mores 05/08/08 04:55:43 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> why do people murder knot? 05/08/08 04:55:46 <Severus379> I was talking moral in general 05/08/08 04:55:51 <Severus379> you are already distinguishing 05/08/08 04:56:07 <Knot4Prophet> well that's y i distinguished 'instinctual morality' based purely on survival, from 'ambiguous morality' which may or may not have survival at its root 05/08/08 04:56:14 <Severus379> course there are instintual morals, but they don't necessarily determine the whole term morality 05/08/08 04:56:27 <Severus379> excuses excuses 05/08/08 04:56:30 <Severus379> I win 05/08/08 04:56:31 <Severus379> 05/08/08 04:56:34 <Knot4Prophet> but u and bust agreed that all morality is learned 05/08/08 04:56:44 <Severus379> not all, no 05/08/08 04:56:45 <Knot4Prophet> and u just confessed that there are instinctual ones 05/08/08 04:56:47 Knot4Prophet 000 wins 05/08/08 04:56:50 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> why do people murder knot? 05/08/08 04:56:52 <Severus379> but the biggest part, aye 05/08/08 04:56:59 <Knot4Prophet> for various reasons, grr 05/08/08 04:57:06 <Knot4Prophet> is there just one reason? 05/08/08 04:57:13 <Severus379> bad conscience is a consequence 05/08/08 04:57:27 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if not murdering is instinctive then yes 05/08/08 04:57:30 <Knot4Prophet> we dont know we will have a bad conscience to do something we havent done 05/08/08 04:57:40 <Severus379> do we notß 05/08/08 04:57:41 <Severus379> ? 05/08/08 04:57:43 <Knot4Prophet> if murdering was instinctive, we'd all do it 05/08/08 04:57:52 <Knot4Prophet> what we all tend to do, is what is instinctive 05/08/08 04:57:57 <Severus379> do we have no ability to theorise that feeling? 05/08/08 04:58:00 <Knot4Prophet> and holding murder as bad is what we all tend to do 05/08/08 04:58:02 <Knot4Prophet> by and large 05/08/08 04:58:14 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if it was instinct not to murder then why do people do it? 05/08/08 04:58:23 <Severus379> good point 05/08/08 04:58:26 <Knot4Prophet> most ppl dont 05/08/08 04:58:31 <Knot4Prophet> the will overcomes biology 05/08/08 04:58:33 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> but some do 05/08/08 04:58:33 <Severus379> and why is it considered moral 05/08/08 04:58:37 <Severus379> most people WOULD 05/08/08 04:58:40 <Knot4Prophet> the will is not always in line with biology 05/08/08 04:58:40 <Severus379> 66% 05/08/08 04:58:47 <Knot4Prophet> would murder? 05/08/08 04:58:48 <Knot4Prophet> bullshit 05/08/08 04:58:50 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 04:58:51 <Knot4Prophet> nope 05/08/08 04:58:53 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 04:58:55 <Knot4Prophet> i dont believe u 05/08/08 04:59:00 <Severus379> don't have to 05/08/08 04:59:03 <Knot4Prophet> prove it then 05/08/08 04:59:05 <Severus379> Milgram said it all 05/08/08 04:59:06 <Knot4Prophet> show me when they did 05/08/08 04:59:10 <Severus379> Milgram experiment 05/08/08 04:59:13 <Knot4Prophet> lol i dont care what some dude said 05/08/08 04:59:17 <Knot4Prophet> nor what ppl claimed 05/08/08 04:59:18 <Severus379> look it up if you don't believe me 05/08/08 04:59:22 <Knot4Prophet> i care what happens for real 05/08/08 04:59:25 <Severus379> been repeated many times 05/08/08 04:59:28 Relentless 258 is listening to Wretch 32 - My Life 05/08/08 04:59:34 <Severus379> they did think it's real 05/08/08 04:59:37 <Knot4Prophet> well show me a case where 66% of ppl DID murder 05/08/08 04:59:38 <Severus379> that's the point 05/08/08 04:59:51 <Knot4Prophet> and i'll believe u 05/08/08 04:59:53 <Severus379> I just HAVE 05/08/08 04:59:57 <Knot4Prophet> no, u didnt 05/08/08 05:00:07 <Severus379> they were convinced they killed someone by electric shock 05/08/08 05:00:12 <Severus379> that counts 05/08/08 05:00:16 <Severus379> because they thought so 05/08/08 05:00:24 <Severus379> another example 05/08/08 05:00:28 <Knot4Prophet> sounds pretty abstract and removed from the source 05/08/08 05:00:30 <Severus379> what the Germans did to the Jews 05/08/08 05:00:34 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> the agument that not murdering is instinctive by the very fact that people murder, and it's not so small a percentage to just be a typical standard deviation point 05/08/08 05:00:36 <Knot4Prophet> they felt justified 05/08/08 05:00:40 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 05:00:43 <Severus379> they murdered 05/08/08 05:00:45 <Severus379> many did 05/08/08 05:00:51 <Knot4Prophet> it is a very small percentage 05/08/08 05:00:52 <BEAR> Taking a life is not only extremely personal it's traumatic. Most people haven't even had a physical confrontation, let alone taken someones life. The amount of adrenaline alone would be enough for most to reconsider their actions in a situation of a murder. 05/08/08 05:00:55 <Severus379> too many for it not to be representative 05/08/08 05:00:56 <Knot4Prophet> shall we check some stats? 05/08/08 05:01:02 <Knot4Prophet> and see what percent murder? 05/08/08 05:01:04 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> no it's not knot 05/08/08 05:01:05 <Severus379> I will be last 05/08/08 05:01:09 <Severus379> just got in 05/08/08 05:01:11 <Severus379> 05/08/08 05:01:17 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> how many people have died in wars? 05/08/08 05:01:26 <Knot4Prophet> wars are justifiable murder 05/08/08 05:01:34 <Knot4Prophet> like if someone comes at u to kill u 05/08/08 05:01:38 <Knot4Prophet> u are justified then 05/08/08 05:01:40 <Severus379> I said that 66% of the people WOULD murder if they feel it's necessary 05/08/08 05:01:41 <Knot4Prophet> based on survival 05/08/08 05:01:43 <Severus379> if pressured 05/08/08 05:01:47 <Knot4Prophet> bullshit 05/08/08 05:01:48 <Severus379> that is proven 05/08/08 05:01:51 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> a general tells you to kill someone you don't know overcomes instinct? 05/08/08 05:01:54 <Knot4Prophet> well if justified, sure 05/08/08 05:01:57 <Severus379> you just don't know the experiment 05/08/08 05:01:58 <Knot4Prophet> im talking bout "murder" 05/08/08 05:02:01 <Severus379> so you put it down 05/08/08 05:02:07 <Severus379> so am I 05/08/08 05:02:13 <Severus379> you just don't want to believe it 05/08/08 05:02:19 <Severus379> and say bullshit instead 05/08/08 05:02:22 <Severus379> sad, really 05/08/08 05:02:29 <Severus379> you are not even looking it up 05/08/08 05:02:33 <Knot4Prophet> if u can justify in ur mind that who u are killing is a threat, then its 'good' 05/08/08 05:02:42 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 05:02:43 <BEAR> What if that general told you if you don't kill someone you don't know, said "someone" would kill you and yours 05/08/08 05:02:45 <Knot4Prophet> if its saving a billion, but costing one, its 'good' 05/08/08 05:02:46 <Severus379> it wasn't like that 05/08/08 05:02:55 <Knot4Prophet> right, bear 05/08/08 05:02:59 <Severus379> they were put under pressure, but not physically 05/08/08 05:03:01 <Knot4Prophet> that's justification 05/08/08 05:03:08 <Severus379> simply convinced by a figure of authority 05/08/08 05:03:26 Relentless 258 is listening to Track 6 05/08/08 05:03:28 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> yes bear like the invasion of iraq 05/08/08 05:03:28 <Knot4Prophet> well im talking about murder in general, not war 05/08/08 05:03:30 <Severus379> and under those circumstances two thirds of people would go as far as murder 05/08/08 05:03:38 <Severus379> omg 05/08/08 05:03:39 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> kill them before they kill us 05/08/08 05:03:39 <Knot4Prophet> if justified? 05/08/08 05:03:41 <Knot4Prophet> of course they would 05/08/08 05:03:43 <Knot4Prophet> so would i 05/08/08 05:03:43 <Severus379> just read it up 05/08/08 05:03:53 <Severus379> honestly, it's complicated 05/08/08 05:03:58 <Knot4Prophet> of course it is 05/08/08 05:04:42 <Knot4Prophet> if someone is bout to kill me and i kill them, its justifiable with regards to survival cuz i can assume that person may kill others too 05/08/08 05:04:51 <BEAR> I honestly feel lighter after I took that shit 05/08/08 05:04:53 <BEAR> and hungry 05/08/08 05:04:54 <Knot4Prophet> and i can also assume that by keepign other alive, keeps me alive 05/08/08 05:05:06 <Severus379> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment 05/08/08 05:05:28 <Knot4Prophet> so justification is about a calculation of survival 05/08/08 05:05:38 <Severus379> nope 05/08/08 05:05:43 <Severus379> no one thought they would die 05/08/08 05:05:45 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> not even close 05/08/08 05:05:50 <Severus379> but we drifted off there 05/08/08 05:05:53 <Severus379> 05/08/08 05:06:00 <Severus379> were talking morality 05/08/08 05:06:10 <Severus379> I would say in general all morals are learnt 05/08/08 05:06:15 <Severus379> apart from a very few 05/08/08 05:06:20 <Knot4Prophet> i'd agree 05/08/08 05:06:20 <Severus379> insignificant 05/08/08 05:06:24 <Knot4Prophet> wrong 05/08/08 05:06:31 <Severus379> because we even overcome the instinctual ones 05/08/08 05:06:34 <Knot4Prophet> survival is the most instinctual morality we have 05/08/08 05:06:40 <Severus379> so they are not part of morality any more 05/08/08 05:06:47 <Knot4Prophet> cuz we all, biologically, fear death 05/08/08 05:06:56 <Severus379> if there are societies who overcome the instictual ones.... one needs to relearn 05/08/08 05:06:58 <Knot4Prophet> we touch a hot pan, and hand moves quick 05/08/08 05:07:00 <Severus379> so basically 05/08/08 05:07:02 <Knot4Prophet> who taught u that? 05/08/08 05:07:03 <Severus379> all morals are learnt 05/08/08 05:07:27 <Severus379> because we also have to learn if the society we live in obeys the survival instinct 05/08/08 05:07:27 <Knot4Prophet> we avoid death, and because we have awareness, we calculate the value of surival of others 05/08/08 05:07:31 <Knot4Prophet> that's instinctual morality 05/08/08 05:07:41 <Knot4Prophet> most ppl obey it 05/08/08 05:07:45 <Knot4Prophet> unless acted upon 05/08/08 05:07:46 <Severus379> yeah, but apart from having the instincs... 05/08/08 05:07:58 <Severus379> we need to learn if that society obeys that rule 05/08/08 05:08:03 <Severus379> is that so difficult? 05/08/08 05:08:11 <Severus379> it is learned also 05/08/08 05:08:16 <Severus379> instinctual or not 05/08/08 05:08:21 <Knot4Prophet> definitely 05/08/08 05:08:25 <Severus379> we have instincts, yes 05/08/08 05:08:33 <Knot4Prophet> we have a legal system comprised of morality 05/08/08 05:08:40 <Severus379> but we have to learn if our environment accepts them 05/08/08 05:08:43 <Severus379> or not 05/08/08 05:08:45 <Severus379> or knot 05/08/08 05:08:48 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:09:03 <Severus379> 05/08/08 05:09:08 <Knot4Prophet> (: 05/08/08 05:09:15 BEAR 999 watchs Esoteric Agenda on google video 05/08/08 05:09:34 <Severus379> the instincts alone... 05/08/08 05:09:39 <Severus379> aren't the basis for morality 05/08/08 05:09:42 <Severus379> they CANNOT be 05/08/08 05:09:44 <Knot4Prophet> are the basis of morality, yup 05/08/08 05:09:45 <Severus379> by logic 05/08/08 05:09:53 <Severus379> it's impossible 05/08/08 05:09:54 <Knot4Prophet> all morality is rooted in 'survival' to some degree 05/08/08 05:09:57 <Knot4Prophet> even copyright law 05/08/08 05:10:02 <Knot4Prophet> survival of the artist 05/08/08 05:10:03 <Severus379> following your chain of thoughts, it's impossible 05/08/08 05:10:05 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> many cultures have embraced human sacrifice, do you believe that would be possible if not murdering was instinctive? 05/08/08 05:10:24 <Severus379> are you doing your probabilistic shite again, knot? 05/08/08 05:10:32 <Severus379> instead of properly defining? 05/08/08 05:10:34 <Knot4Prophet> they felt that the few sacrificed benefitted the rest, on a survival basis 05/08/08 05:10:36 <Knot4Prophet> check it out 05/08/08 05:10:42 <Knot4Prophet> as to y they sacrificed 05/08/08 05:10:52 <Severus379> not necessarily 05/08/08 05:10:57 <Knot4Prophet> properly defining what? 05/08/08 05:11:04 <Severus379> MORALITY! 05/08/08 05:11:06 Relentless 258 is listening to Enya - If I Could Be Where You Are 05/08/08 05:11:07 <Knot4Prophet> not necessarily, but mainly 05/08/08 05:11:07 <Severus379> fucksake 05/08/08 05:11:10 Severus379 swears 05/08/08 05:11:12 <Knot4Prophet> i defined it, first 05/08/08 05:11:13 Relentless 258 is listening to Music-Eurythmics - There Must Be An Angel 05/08/08 05:11:14 <Knot4Prophet> from the start 05/08/08 05:11:22 <Knot4Prophet> my definition 05/08/08 05:11:26 <Severus379> you define it from a probabilistic point of view 05/08/08 05:11:26 <Knot4Prophet> which is a new one, obviously 05/08/08 05:11:30 <Severus379> by saying MOST 05/08/08 05:11:34 <Severus379> that sucks 05/08/08 05:11:41 <Severus379> it is not correct 05/08/08 05:11:55 <Knot4Prophet> u cannot say "all" for any human endeavour such as 'morality' 05/08/08 05:11:58 <Severus379> its like: the bigger the shoe size, the better the child will be at maths 05/08/08 05:12:02 <Knot4Prophet> it has no consistent meaning 05/08/08 05:12:06 <Knot4Prophet> i gave it one 05/08/08 05:12:11 <Severus379> forgetting that age is the relevant variable here 05/08/08 05:12:27 <Severus379> it has a consistent function 05/08/08 05:12:32 <Severus379> it's the foundation 05/08/08 05:12:33 <Knot4Prophet> i never factored age into it or out of it 05/08/08 05:12:35 <Severus379> of society 05/08/08 05:12:45 <Severus379> no, you misunderstood that 05/08/08 05:13:09 <Severus379> by argueing from a probabilistic point of view you miss out the opportunity to make a definition that fits all 05/08/08 05:13:15 <Knot4Prophet> when we talk of any human behaviour we can never say "all" - most is the best we can do 05/08/08 05:13:17 <Severus379> read again 05/08/08 05:13:36 <Knot4Prophet> i disagree that i've missed any opportunities 05/08/08 05:13:41 <Severus379> when we talk about a term we can try and find a definition that allows no exceptions 05/08/08 05:13:43 <Knot4Prophet> i wanted a narrow definition 05/08/08 05:13:47 <Severus379> take it in a abstract level 05/08/08 05:13:53 <Severus379> but you're not doing that 05/08/08 05:13:59 <Severus379> you stay in the raw bit 05/08/08 05:14:09 <Severus379> insisting on your theory 05/08/08 05:14:24 <Knot4Prophet> biology all wants to survive, i said - but obviously that's only "most" 05/08/08 05:14:29 <Knot4Prophet> some is damaged 05/08/08 05:14:30 <BEAR> http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid= ... m2AQ&hl=en 05/08/08 05:14:32 <Severus379> I am not talking BIOLOGY! 05/08/08 05:14:42 <Knot4Prophet> that's part of my theory of morality 05/08/08 05:14:46 <Severus379> we can only explain the social out of the social 05/08/08 05:14:48 <Knot4Prophet> biology is necessary 05/08/08 05:14:55 <Knot4Prophet> entities 05/08/08 05:14:59 <Knot4Prophet> who live and die 05/08/08 05:15:01 <Severus379> ufff 05/08/08 05:15:12 <Knot4Prophet> we all live, we all die 05/08/08 05:15:13 <Severus379> it's too holistic, mate 05/08/08 05:15:20 <Knot4Prophet> hows that for absolutism? 05/08/08 05:15:20 <Severus379> too shallow 05/08/08 05:15:21 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:15:27 <Knot4Prophet> u just say that when u dont agree 05/08/08 05:15:32 <Knot4Prophet> like u did with anti 05/08/08 05:15:32 <Severus379> nope 05/08/08 05:15:35 <Severus379> haha 05/08/08 05:15:37 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 05:15:51 <Severus379> no, combining them is too complicated just now 05/08/08 05:16:01 <Severus379> difference is, anti will just repeat himself 05/08/08 05:16:07 <Severus379> you'll explain better 05/08/08 05:16:09 <Severus379> 05/08/08 05:16:17 <Knot4Prophet> i dont need to include copyright law into my theory of morality cuz i dont feel that copyright law is morally justifiable 05/08/08 05:16:31 <Knot4Prophet> i dont need an all encompassing theory that explains all human behaviour 05/08/08 05:16:31 <Severus379> well, then it will stay just that 05/08/08 05:16:34 <Severus379> YOUR theory 05/08/08 05:16:39 <Severus379> applicable to no one 05/08/08 05:16:40 <Knot4Prophet> im just explaing base instincts 05/08/08 05:16:44 <Severus379> but knot 05/08/08 05:16:51 <Severus379> hmmm 05/08/08 05:16:54 <Knot4Prophet> using real life examples 05/08/08 05:16:56 <Severus379> what is that worth? 05/08/08 05:16:59 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> morality is not instinctive 05/08/08 05:17:00 <Knot4Prophet> of real ppl and my own experience 05/08/08 05:17:08 <Knot4Prophet> it is for me, grrr 05/08/08 05:17:15 <Knot4Prophet> i didnt need to learn that i dont want to die 05/08/08 05:17:16 <Severus379> yeah but just for you 05/08/08 05:17:26 <Knot4Prophet> i know many ppl who agree with what i just said 05/08/08 05:17:26 <Severus379> why make theories that don't apply to anyone 05/08/08 05:17:33 <Severus379> bit selfish for a great mind like you 05/08/08 05:17:35 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> there is far too much immorality for it to be 05/08/08 05:17:37 <Knot4Prophet> they apply to everyone, whether they agree or not 05/08/08 05:17:40 Relentless 258 is listening to no artist - AudioTrack 01 05/08/08 05:17:45 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 05:17:49 <Knot4Prophet> what consists of immorality? 05/08/08 05:17:49 <Severus379> how can they 05/08/08 05:17:50 mickey572_27765 (207.192.209.233) (Cable 813 files) has entered 05/08/08 05:17:50 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] mickey : 207.192.209.233 : 15368 05/08/08 05:17:54 <Knot4Prophet> justifiable murder doesnt 05/08/08 05:17:59 <Knot4Prophet> list what does, grrr 05/08/08 05:18:02 <Severus379> immorality means disacknowledgement 05/08/08 05:18:03 <Knot4Prophet> list all this 'immorality' 05/08/08 05:18:05 <Severus379> of an action 05/08/08 05:18:14 <Severus379> and consequences could be punishment 05/08/08 05:18:27 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> for a start different cultures define morality differently 05/08/08 05:18:29 <Knot4Prophet> if i rape some chick, that's not disacknowledging her 05/08/08 05:18:41 <Knot4Prophet> yeah the ambiguous morality is defined differently 05/08/08 05:18:44 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if it was instinct one size woud fit all 05/08/08 05:18:44 <Knot4Prophet> cuz its ambiguous 05/08/08 05:18:45 <Severus379> immoral is whatever the certain group decides is punishable/ disacknowledgeable 05/08/08 05:18:47 <Severus379> immoral is whatever the certain group decides is punishable/ disacknowledgeable 05/08/08 05:18:49 <Severus379> immoral is whatever the certain group decides is punishable/ disacknowledgeable 05/08/08 05:18:50 <Severus379> immoral is whatever the certain group decides is punishable/ disacknowledgeable 05/08/08 05:18:51 <Knot4Prophet> murder is a code across all cultures 05/08/08 05:19:04 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> no it's not 05/08/08 05:19:05 <Knot4Prophet> we all "decided" that murder was wrong? 05/08/08 05:19:06 <Severus379> here we go, there is a term that excludes exceptions 05/08/08 05:19:10 <Knot4Prophet> bull shit. 05/08/08 05:19:18 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> the aztec murdered for fun 05/08/08 05:19:23 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 05:19:27 <Knot4Prophet> not each other and not for fun 05/08/08 05:19:30 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> many cultures have 05/08/08 05:19:35 <Knot4Prophet> they felt justified 05/08/08 05:19:37 <Severus379> we "decide that it's wrong cause we know it's wrong 05/08/08 05:19:40 <Knot4Prophet> they didnt murder randomly 05/08/08 05:19:41 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> a human is a human knot 05/08/08 05:19:43 <Severus379> you only attacked the weakest word 05/08/08 05:19:51 <Severus379> ignoring my great sentence 05/08/08 05:19:53 <Knot4Prophet> humans do not murder, by and large 05/08/08 05:19:59 <Knot4Prophet> lol sev 05/08/08 05:20:05 <Knot4Prophet> y not attack weakest link? 05/08/08 05:20:07 Severus379 is in a huff 05/08/08 05:20:09 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if it's hard wired we wouldn't do it 05/08/08 05:20:20 <Knot4Prophet> wires dont always work right 05/08/08 05:20:27 <Knot4Prophet> we have deformities too 05/08/08 05:20:30 <Severus379> we don't do it for several reasons 05/08/08 05:20:30 <mickey572> well... tell me of 911 then.. was that murder 05/08/08 05:20:36 <Severus379> but that doesn't fucking matter 05/08/08 05:20:36 <Knot4Prophet> surely 05/08/08 05:20:38 <Knot4Prophet> @mick 05/08/08 05:20:44 <Severus379> it doesn't matter why we don't do it 05/08/08 05:20:49 <Knot4Prophet> it does to me 05/08/08 05:20:51 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> so all murderers are just people with broken insticts? 05/08/08 05:20:57 <Knot4Prophet> perhaps 05/08/08 05:21:04 <Severus379> yeah, but it's not important what matters to you 05/08/08 05:21:04 <Knot4Prophet> perhaps their justifications are fucked up 05/08/08 05:21:07 <Severus379> on a large scale 05/08/08 05:21:15 <Knot4Prophet> it is important 05/08/08 05:21:18 <Knot4Prophet> cuz i declare it 05/08/08 05:21:32 Severus379 sighs and throws her arms up in resignation 05/08/08 05:21:35 <Knot4Prophet> if im bothering to ponder it, it must be important 05/08/08 05:21:39 <mickey572> grrrrrrrrrrrrrr when you figure out the pilot ... of 911 you see 05/08/08 05:21:51 <mickey572> ok 05/08/08 05:22:12 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i see what mick? 05/08/08 05:22:29 <Knot4Prophet> show me a culture where ppl didnt work together to aid each other's surival 05/08/08 05:22:33 <BEAR> Knot 05/08/08 05:22:42 <BEAR> I'm pretty sure this doc. is bullshit... but 05/08/08 05:22:46 <Knot4Prophet> show me the success of "murder" when we consider the balloonign population of the earth 05/08/08 05:22:48 <BEAR> Not completely sure. 05/08/08 05:22:50 <Severus379> what does that have to do with defining moral??? 05/08/08 05:22:52 <mickey572> sigh...........when you figure out the pilot ... of 911 05/08/08 05:23:01 <Knot4Prophet> shall we check some stats on human population thru the past 5000 years? 05/08/08 05:23:02 <Severus379> you can't see morality by what people do 05/08/08 05:23:04 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 05:23:04 <mickey572> you will see....... ok 05/08/08 05:23:08 <Knot4Prophet> lets see how "successful" murder is 05/08/08 05:23:10 <mickey572> good grief 05/08/08 05:23:11 Relentless 258 is listening to Artist-Session1 Track1 05/08/08 05:23:11 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 05:23:15 <Severus379> you can only see it by what people unish 05/08/08 05:23:17 <Severus379> punish 05/08/08 05:23:25 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> people by and large don't murder because of consequence 05/08/08 05:23:36 <Severus379> that doesn't matter either 05/08/08 05:23:40 <Severus379> what matters is... 05/08/08 05:23:41 <Knot4Prophet> what's morally instinctual is what is found across all cultures, is what im saying, sev 05/08/08 05:23:54 <BEAR> aaaand you're engrossed 05/08/08 05:23:55 <Knot4Prophet> is that y u dont murder, grr? 05/08/08 05:24:00 BEAR 999 goes back to his doc. 05/08/08 05:24:01 <mickey572> dang knot..... you are so smart 05/08/08 05:24:04 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:24:06 <Knot4Prophet> u didnt answer last time i asked 05/08/08 05:24:09 <mickey572> sorry... i got to go 05/08/08 05:24:11 mickey572_27765 has left 05/08/08 05:24:11 <Knot4Prophet> i am smart, aye 05/08/08 05:24:19 <Relentless> cunt 05/08/08 05:24:20 <Severus379> there is only one universal moral, man 05/08/08 05:24:20 <Relentless> lol 05/08/08 05:24:22 <Knot4Prophet> is that y u dont murder ppl, grr? 05/08/08 05:24:23 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> no knot i don't murder because of empathy 05/08/08 05:24:24 <Severus379> how many times??? 05/08/08 05:24:32 <Knot4Prophet> but no one else is afforded that? 05/08/08 05:24:38 <Knot4Prophet> yet im sitting her claiming same thing 05/08/08 05:24:46 <Knot4Prophet> and stats prove that most ppl are like me 05/08/08 05:24:49 <Knot4Prophet> history proves it 05/08/08 05:24:55 <Severus379> hmmm 05/08/08 05:24:58 <Knot4Prophet> yet u think most ppl murder not cuz y u do? 05/08/08 05:24:59 <Severus379> there was this guy 05/08/08 05:25:00 <Knot4Prophet> seriously? 05/08/08 05:25:03 <Knot4Prophet> come now 05/08/08 05:25:10 <Severus379> who lived with hundreds of clans 05/08/08 05:25:14 <Severus379> and sent people out 05/08/08 05:25:16 <BEAR> Jesus christ 05/08/08 05:25:19 <Severus379> levi strauss 05/08/08 05:25:25 <BEAR> this video is damn near lunacy 05/08/08 05:25:36 <Severus379> and he found that the only universal moral is incest taboo 05/08/08 05:25:39 <Severus379> NOT murder 05/08/08 05:25:51 <Knot4Prophet> well i disagree, but he may define morality different 05/08/08 05:25:58 <Severus379> you can't disagree 05/08/08 05:26:00 <Knot4Prophet> i equate good with 'survival' 05/08/08 05:26:05 <Severus379> urgh 05/08/08 05:26:05 <Knot4Prophet> and bad with 'death' 05/08/08 05:26:11 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> not in the australian aboriginal population ren 05/08/08 05:26:16 <Severus379> there is a reason why they are two different words 05/08/08 05:26:18 <Severus379> no? 05/08/08 05:26:21 <Knot4Prophet> they do incest? 05/08/08 05:26:29 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> sure do 05/08/08 05:26:31 <Knot4Prophet> cool 05/08/08 05:26:33 <Severus379> grrrr, they do not 05/08/08 05:26:34 <Knot4Prophet> so did Lot 05/08/08 05:26:40 <Severus379> yes ad it was wrong 05/08/08 05:26:41 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> yes they do ren 05/08/08 05:26:43 <Knot4Prophet> and god saved his ass just to do it 05/08/08 05:26:46 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 05:26:49 <Severus379> people doing it shows that it's wrong 05/08/08 05:26:50 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> still do infact 05/08/08 05:26:56 <Severus379> cause it's punished 05/08/08 05:27:08 <Knot4Prophet> it causes deformities, which is anti-survival 05/08/08 05:27:09 <Severus379> incest is the only thing that is never accepted 05/08/08 05:27:16 <Hucky713> bollox 05/08/08 05:27:18 <Knot4Prophet> but not always deformities, so ambiguous 05/08/08 05:27:28 <Severus379> doesn't mean that people don't do it 05/08/08 05:27:29 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> it's punished now if it's discovered 05/08/08 05:27:36 <Severus379> it's just never accepted 05/08/08 05:27:38 <Severus379> as a whole 05/08/08 05:27:47 <Severus379> australians do not legalise incest 05/08/08 05:27:47 <Knot4Prophet> lots of the aristocracy in france and england and elsewhere practised it, too 05/08/08 05:27:52 <Severus379> illegal = immoral 05/08/08 05:27:55 <Severus379> in that case 05/08/08 05:28:03 <Severus379> that proves my point 05/08/08 05:28:08 <Hucky713> murders not immoral? 05/08/08 05:28:16 Relentless 258 is listening to Bloods & Crips - Blood in Blood out 05/08/08 05:28:17 <choco_forever456> till recently in UK was legal the marriage between primary cousines 05/08/08 05:28:17 <Knot4Prophet> proves that incest isnt instinctual morality, aye 05/08/08 05:28:20 <Severus379> not everywhere 05/08/08 05:28:21 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> before the european conquest it was common practice 05/08/08 05:28:25 <Severus379> in third reich it wasn't 05/08/08 05:28:43 <choco_forever456> in ancient times bro/sis sex wasnt considered imoral 05/08/08 05:28:43 <Severus379> and you can't "DEFINE" based on "PROBABILITIES" 05/08/08 05:28:46 <Hucky713> ah well, they were correct huh. 05/08/08 05:28:46 BEAR 999 looks back in 05/08/08 05:28:50 <Severus379> that's not what a definition is 05/08/08 05:28:54 <Knot4Prophet> well this incest taboo is not consistent 05/08/08 05:28:54 <Severus379> that's a hypothesis 05/08/08 05:28:58 <Knot4Prophet> not like murder is 05/08/08 05:29:05 <Knot4Prophet> cuz murder = non survival 05/08/08 05:29:06 <Severus379> incest taboo is consistent 05/08/08 05:29:07 <Knot4Prophet> incest doesnt 05/08/08 05:29:08 <Knot4Prophet> nope 05/08/08 05:29:12 <Knot4Prophet> grr just showed how it aint 05/08/08 05:29:14 <Knot4Prophet> and so did choco 05/08/08 05:29:15 <Severus379> it is always punished 05/08/08 05:29:16 <Knot4Prophet> and so did i 05/08/08 05:29:17 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> it is mentioned in the OT 05/08/08 05:29:18 <Severus379> never accepted 05/08/08 05:29:23 <Knot4Prophet> it was in OT too, aye 05/08/08 05:29:25 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:29:28 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> lot and his daughters 05/08/08 05:29:31 <Knot4Prophet> aye 05/08/08 05:29:31 <BEAR> Instinctual 05/08/08 05:29:33 <Severus379> but God killed thousands 05/08/08 05:29:33 <Knot4Prophet> i wrote an essay on it 05/08/08 05:29:47 <choco_forever456> not always , just recently it started to be accepted as imoral among most societies 05/08/08 05:29:50 <Knot4Prophet> him fucking his kids, after being spared from sodom and gomorrahs destruction 05/08/08 05:29:51 <Severus379> the OT isn't exactly a foundation for morality 05/08/08 05:29:59 <choco_forever456> after they realised it jeopartises survival 05/08/08 05:30:00 <Knot4Prophet> history is, tho 05/08/08 05:30:08 <Severus379> just because someone wrote that fairy tale 05/08/08 05:30:08 <choco_forever456> jeo... 05/08/08 05:30:08 <BEAR> They got dad drunk and went for a ride 05/08/08 05:30:11 <choco_forever456> whatever 05/08/08 05:30:12 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:30:18 <Severus379> incest happens 05/08/08 05:30:22 <BEAR> Right 05/08/08 05:30:23 <Knot4Prophet> in all fiction there is non fiction, and vice versa 05/08/08 05:30:26 <Severus379> but it's aöwaysdespised 05/08/08 05:30:30 <Knot4Prophet> u cannot totally separate them 05/08/08 05:30:30 <Severus379> people are outraged 05/08/08 05:30:36 <Severus379> it is made illegal 05/08/08 05:30:37 <Knot4Prophet> not always, some dig it 05/08/08 05:30:38 <Severus379> or punished 05/08/08 05:30:42 <Severus379> but never accapted 05/08/08 05:30:54 <Knot4Prophet> grr said in aus aborigines it was 05/08/08 05:30:57 <Severus379> at list first degree incest 05/08/08 05:30:59 <Severus379> only that 05/08/08 05:31:02 <Severus379> not cousins, etc 05/08/08 05:31:10 <Knot4Prophet> well now ur being murky 05/08/08 05:31:11 <choco_forever456> is marriage amongst cousines incest to you , ren? 05/08/08 05:31:11 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 05:31:16 <Severus379> read up on Levi-Strauss incest taboo 05/08/08 05:31:19 <Severus379> he says it well 05/08/08 05:31:30 <BEAR> I'm sorry but I have a first cousin who is smokin' hot. Delusional as fuck.. whorey and stuck up. Arrogant lil christian chit. But still pretty fucking hot. 05/08/08 05:31:35 <Knot4Prophet> i dont buy into other ppl's theories, much 05/08/08 05:31:38 <Severus379> marriage amongst cousins isn't part of the incest taboo, no 05/08/08 05:31:43 <Knot4Prophet> unless i can get there on my own, too 05/08/08 05:31:46 <BEAR> Course you don't, knot 05/08/08 05:31:50 <Severus379> that's silly 05/08/08 05:31:53 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> ummm father/daughter brother/brother it was just sex to them 05/08/08 05:31:57 <BEAR> you tank track over it and make yer own 05/08/08 05:32:04 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 05:32:07 <Knot4Prophet> i dont consider anyone more capable than me 05/08/08 05:32:11 <Knot4Prophet> y should i? 05/08/08 05:32:12 <BEAR> < does 05/08/08 05:32:18 Severus379 does, too 05/08/08 05:32:23 <choco_forever456> romans were shagging their own sisters like chimps 05/08/08 05:32:24 BEAR 999 grins 05/08/08 05:32:30 <BEAR> Right, choco 05/08/08 05:32:31 <choco_forever456> brithers ocasinally 05/08/08 05:32:35 <choco_forever456> brothers* 05/08/08 05:32:36 <BEAR> and the greeks before them 05/08/08 05:32:39 <Severus379> do you know that cause it was punished? 05/08/08 05:32:39 <Knot4Prophet> i dont defer to 'received wisdom' 05/08/08 05:32:40 <BEAR> sons 05/08/08 05:32:41 <choco_forever456> too much 05/08/08 05:32:48 <Severus379> cause people DO incest 05/08/08 05:32:53 <BEAR> What other kind of wisdom is there, knot? 05/08/08 05:32:55 <Severus379> that's how we find out 05/08/08 05:32:59 <Severus379> if it's immoral 05/08/08 05:33:07 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> just as people DO murder 05/08/08 05:33:07 <Knot4Prophet> murder is more consistent as a moral factor than is incest 05/08/08 05:33:10 <Severus379> by the breech of the morale 05/08/08 05:33:17 <Severus379> it is? 05/08/08 05:33:18 <BEAR> Much more. 05/08/08 05:33:19 <Severus379> prove it 05/08/08 05:33:24 <BEAR> axiom 05/08/08 05:33:31 <Severus379> nope 05/08/08 05:33:34 <BEAR> yer 05/08/08 05:33:35 <Knot4Prophet> and the degree to which incest is consistent, is the degree to which it is instinctually moral 05/08/08 05:33:53 <Knot4Prophet> same goes for any other moral behaviour 05/08/08 05:33:58 <Severus379> murder isn't necessarily immoral 05/08/08 05:34:00 <Severus379> therefore 05/08/08 05:34:07 <Knot4Prophet> the less consistent, the less instinctual, the more 'learned' 05/08/08 05:34:07 <Hucky713> bollox 05/08/08 05:34:10 <Severus379> it cannot be part of the definition 05/08/08 05:34:18 <BEAR> hm 05/08/08 05:34:19 <Severus379> cannot be 05/08/08 05:34:20 Sprinkles657_13180 (90.202.218.194) (Cable 0 files) has entered 05/08/08 05:34:20 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] Sprinkles : 90.202.218.194 : 56587 05/08/08 05:34:23 <Severus379> logic 05/08/08 05:34:31 <choco_forever456> if the results of such an actions affects the welfare of other or himself , thats how we find if something is moral or not. 05/08/08 05:34:32 <Knot4Prophet> if murder isnt immoral, nothig is 05/08/08 05:34:36 <Knot4Prophet> and we dont need to bother conversiong 05/08/08 05:34:45 <Severus379> murder isn't immoral in all societies 05/08/08 05:34:49 <Severus379> I said that 05/08/08 05:34:54 <Severus379> so it's not partof it 05/08/08 05:34:57 Relentless 258 is listening to Gin Blossoms - Hey Jealousy 05/08/08 05:35:01 <Knot4Prophet> random, unjustified murder is immoral in all societies 05/08/08 05:35:04 <Knot4Prophet> or they wouldnt exist! 05/08/08 05:35:05 <Severus379> only MOSTLY 05/08/08 05:35:12 <Severus379> but it doesn't make the definition 05/08/08 05:35:16 <Knot4Prophet> same with any human behaviour 05/08/08 05:35:20 <Severus379> I know 05/08/08 05:35:29 <Severus379> but it doesn't make the definition 05/08/08 05:35:33 <Knot4Prophet> it makes mine 05/08/08 05:35:36 <Severus379> do you knot understand? 05/08/08 05:35:50 <Knot4Prophet> random, unjustified murder is immoral in all societies 05/08/08 05:35:57 <BEAR> Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder), and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (seco 05/08/08 05:36:01 <Severus379> I was talking general 05/08/08 05:36:15 <Hucky713> talking bollox more like. 05/08/08 05:36:15 <Severus379> not YOUR little homemade probabilistic defo 05/08/08 05:36:16 <Knot4Prophet> well ur using a definition of murder that i dont adhere to 05/08/08 05:36:29 <Knot4Prophet> i dont call any old killing murder 05/08/08 05:36:31 <Knot4Prophet> neither does the law 05/08/08 05:36:37 <Knot4Prophet> i can kill someone who attacks me 05/08/08 05:36:38 <BEAR> Right. 05/08/08 05:36:40 <Knot4Prophet> justifiably 05/08/08 05:36:44 <Severus379> I am saying that when you define moral it doesn't include a certain thing 05/08/08 05:36:47 <Knot4Prophet> its righteoius 05/08/08 05:36:48 <Severus379> it is a construct 05/08/08 05:36:57 <Knot4Prophet> all things are constructs, so what? 05/08/08 05:36:59 <Severus379> different everywhere 05/08/08 05:37:11 <Knot4Prophet> if it explains something, it has value 05/08/08 05:37:11 <Severus379> apart from the incest thing, but that is completely unimportant 05/08/08 05:37:15 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:37:17 <Severus379> everything is a construct 05/08/08 05:37:18 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:37:22 <Severus379> not instinct 05/08/08 05:37:26 <Severus379> CONSTRUCZ 05/08/08 05:37:28 <Severus379> hehehe 05/08/08 05:37:31 <Severus379> construct 05/08/08 05:37:34 <Severus379> we are not animals 05/08/08 05:37:35 <BEAR> and I think you're well "constructed" 05/08/08 05:37:38 BEAR 999 growls 05/08/08 05:37:41 <Knot4Prophet> just cuz we fashion a construct doesnt mean the things we construct it around are nonexistent 05/08/08 05:37:44 <Knot4Prophet> nor random 05/08/08 05:37:48 <Hucky713> we are Animals, you numpty 05/08/08 05:38:02 <Severus379> yeah, but the term moral raises above that fact 05/08/08 05:38:07 <Knot4Prophet> how so? 05/08/08 05:38:10 <Knot4Prophet> "raises"? 05/08/08 05:38:13 <Severus379> I am talking about the things that distinguish us 05/08/08 05:38:17 <Severus379> from animals 05/08/08 05:38:23 <Severus379> social construction 05/08/08 05:38:28 <Hucky713> like murder not being immoral? 05/08/08 05:38:29 <Knot4Prophet> im talking bout instinctual morality 05/08/08 05:38:31 <Severus379> sitting in a chat for example? 05/08/08 05:38:43 <Knot4Prophet> we all know murder is wrong, and we didnt need to be taught it 05/08/08 05:38:51 <Severus379> course we are animals to some degree, but that goes without saying 05/08/08 05:38:52 <BEAR> an inborn pattern of activity or tendency to action common to a given biological species. 05/08/08 05:38:56 <BEAR> Instinct 05/08/08 05:38:58 <Knot4Prophet> cuz we are "aware" or as grr said, he can empathize, which requires awareness 05/08/08 05:39:02 <Severus379> I think murder is immoral 05/08/08 05:39:07 <Knot4Prophet> it is! 05/08/08 05:39:07 <Severus379> but not everyone does 05/08/08 05:39:08 <Hucky713> lol 05/08/08 05:39:08 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:39:13 <Knot4Prophet> most everyone does 05/08/08 05:39:21 <Severus379> so it cannot define the term 05/08/08 05:39:21 <Knot4Prophet> only a negligible amount dont 05/08/08 05:39:24 Relentless 258 is listening to Artist-Session1 Track1 05/08/08 05:39:30 <Severus379> "most" can't make adefinition 05/08/08 05:39:30 <choco_forever456> which are usually mental 05/08/08 05:39:34 <Knot4Prophet> most can so 05/08/08 05:39:38 <Severus379> what? 05/08/08 05:39:49 <Severus379> it can make a hypothesis 05/08/08 05:39:53 <Severus379> not a definition 05/08/08 05:39:55 <Knot4Prophet> if it contains 99.9% thats enough for me to define a class 05/08/08 05:40:01 <Severus379> no it isn't 05/08/08 05:40:05 <Knot4Prophet> it is for me 05/08/08 05:40:08 <Severus379> it's a hypothesis 05/08/08 05:40:19 <Knot4Prophet> all things are hypotheses 05/08/08 05:40:26 <Severus379> definitions are all including 05/08/08 05:40:32 <Knot4Prophet> some are, some arent 05/08/08 05:40:33 <Severus379> and excluding exceptions 05/08/08 05:40:42 <Knot4Prophet> my morality is divided into 2 05/08/08 05:40:42 <Severus379> that's what define means 05/08/08 05:40:44 <Knot4Prophet> which covers all 05/08/08 05:40:54 <Severus379> umpf 05/08/08 05:40:58 <Knot4Prophet> and is backed by biology 05/08/08 05:41:00 <Knot4Prophet> and history 05/08/08 05:41:04 <Severus379> I am not talking about FOR YOU 05/08/08 05:41:10 <Knot4Prophet> im talking bout for all of us 05/08/08 05:41:14 <Knot4Prophet> its applicable to u too 05/08/08 05:41:21 <Severus379> it isn't 05/08/08 05:41:22 <Knot4Prophet> i know u dont murder cuz of what grr said too 05/08/08 05:41:31 <Knot4Prophet> cuz u can empathize 05/08/08 05:41:33 <Knot4Prophet> cuz u value life 05/08/08 05:41:38 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:41:39 <Knot4Prophet> cuz ur biology says "survive" 05/08/08 05:41:42 <Severus379> but besides that 05/08/08 05:41:50 <choco_forever456> I am telling you its immoral whatever action is carried and it affects the welfare and life of itself or others . 05/08/08 05:42:20 <Severus379> what immoral is you can see by what is being punished/disacknowledged 05/08/08 05:42:32 <Severus379> that doesn't include things yet 05/08/08 05:42:37 <Knot4Prophet> and im saying the degree to which that action is ambiguously against surivival is the degree to which is ambiguous morality 05/08/08 05:42:38 <Severus379> we fill that definition 05/08/08 05:42:48 <Severus379> oh knot 05/08/08 05:42:55 <Severus379> we are all destroying out planet 05/08/08 05:42:58 <Severus379> you are smoking 05/08/08 05:43:00 <Knot4Prophet> says who? 05/08/08 05:43:10 <Knot4Prophet> how do i know smoking destroys the planet? 05/08/08 05:43:11 <Severus379> too complicated 05/08/08 05:43:15 <Severus379> different example 05/08/08 05:43:16 <Knot4Prophet> i dont believe that at all 05/08/08 05:43:20 <Knot4Prophet> its 'ambiguous' 05/08/08 05:43:21 mickey572_27765 (207.192.209.233) (Cable 813 files) has entered 05/08/08 05:43:21 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] mickey : 207.192.209.233 : 24072 05/08/08 05:43:23 <Knot4Prophet> whether it does or not 05/08/08 05:43:26 <Severus379> many people smoke = destry themselves to a degree 05/08/08 05:43:30 <Severus379> this is not immoral 05/08/08 05:43:33 <Knot4Prophet> suicide isnt immoral, nope 05/08/08 05:43:35 <Knot4Prophet> agreed. 05/08/08 05:43:38 <Severus379> even though it goes against survival 05/08/08 05:43:43 <Knot4Prophet> not everyone else's 05/08/08 05:43:47 <Knot4Prophet> morality takes 2 remember? 05/08/08 05:43:53 <Knot4Prophet> from my first principles 05/08/08 05:43:53 <Severus379> ...sigh... 05/08/08 05:43:55 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 05:43:55 <choco_forever456> yes 05/08/08 05:43:59 <choco_forever456> 05/08/08 05:44:07 BEAR 999 winks at Ren 05/08/08 05:44:10 <BEAR> It takes two.. 05/08/08 05:44:15 <Knot4Prophet> i've considered every deleterious human behaviour 05/08/08 05:44:21 <Knot4Prophet> b4 i ventured on with this theory 05/08/08 05:44:26 <Knot4Prophet> think up some more 05/08/08 05:44:34 <Knot4Prophet> and i'll show u how they are ambiguous 05/08/08 05:44:34 BEAR 999 snorts a rail 05/08/08 05:44:39 <Knot4Prophet> or not immoral at all 05/08/08 05:44:39 Relentless 258 is listening to Invincible No Fear - AudioTrack 02 05/08/08 05:44:45 <choco_forever456> you must be bloody good if you managed to make that girl sigh 05/08/08 05:44:46 BEAR 999 tortures a small animal 05/08/08 05:44:53 <Knot4Prophet> lol she's tough aye 05/08/08 05:44:55 <choco_forever456> she is endlesssssssssssssssssssssssss 05/08/08 05:44:56 <mickey572> wow.......knot.....such a genious 05/08/08 05:44:59 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:45:00 <Knot4Prophet> relax mick 05/08/08 05:45:04 <BEAR> genius? 05/08/08 05:45:14 <mickey572> how......oh how do you do it 05/08/08 05:45:18 <Knot4Prophet> idk 05/08/08 05:45:19 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:45:20 <Severus379> Durkheim's views on crime were a departure from conventional notions. He believed that crime is "bound up with the fundamental conditions of all social life" and serves a social function. He stated that crime implies, "not only that the way remains open to necessary change, but that in certain cases it directly proposes these changes... crime [can thus be] a useful prelude to reforms." 05/08/08 05:45:21 <BEAR> genieous? (continued below) |
Author: | Knot4Prophet [ Thu May 08, 2008 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
05/08/08 05:45:23 <Knot4Prophet> just comes natural, mick 05/08/08 05:45:24 <choco_forever456> hahaaaaaaaaaaaaa 05/08/08 05:45:29 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:45:37 <Severus379> In this sense he saw crime as being able to release certain social tensions and so have a cleansing or purging effect in society. He further stated that "the authority which the moral conscience enjoys must not be excessive; otherwise, no-one would dare to criticize it, and it would too easily congeal into an immutable form. To make progress, individual originality must be able to express itself.. 05/08/08 05:45:46 <choco_forever456> their is our ren severus 05/08/08 05:45:49 <Knot4Prophet> what constitutes "crime" isnt consistent 05/08/08 05:45:51 <choco_forever456> ladies and gentlemen 05/08/08 05:45:52 <Severus379> [even] the originality of the criminal... shall also be possible" (Durkheim, 1895). 05/08/08 05:45:53 <Severus379> here 05/08/08 05:45:55 <mickey572> you are so smart 05/08/08 05:46:03 <mickey572> goodness 05/08/08 05:46:15 <choco_forever456> ren I would employ you as my lawyer on the spot 05/08/08 05:46:16 <BEAR> Stop masturbating everytime Knot speaks, mick 05/08/08 05:46:25 <Severus379> lol choco 05/08/08 05:46:27 <Severus379> HAHA 05/08/08 05:46:30 <mickey572> oh.... sorry bear 05/08/08 05:46:30 <Severus379> that was funny 05/08/08 05:46:32 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:46:35 <BEAR> Better be. 05/08/08 05:46:42 <choco_forever456> thats me ! funny fanny 05/08/08 05:46:44 <choco_forever456> opps 05/08/08 05:46:52 <BEAR> What do you mean what constitutes a crime ain't consistent 05/08/08 05:46:57 <BEAR> waitr 05/08/08 05:47:02 <BEAR> what do you mean by consistent 05/08/08 05:47:07 <Knot4Prophet> well crime we may do, but if the morality of the 'crime' is ambiguous, then its not surprising some may do it 05/08/08 05:47:07 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 05:47:22 <mickey572> give me a break 05/08/08 05:47:23 <BEAR> Like yer tokin' 05/08/08 05:47:24 <Knot4Prophet> if i "steal" a loaf of bread to feed starving kids, is that a "crime"? 05/08/08 05:47:26 mickey572_27765 has left 05/08/08 05:47:27 <BEAR> Like yer tokin' 05/08/08 05:47:29 <Knot4Prophet> not to me it aint 05/08/08 05:47:32 <Knot4Prophet> but to the law it is 05/08/08 05:47:36 <BEAR> Sure it is. 05/08/08 05:47:37 <BEAR> right 05/08/08 05:47:44 <BEAR> You just see the benefit of the crime 05/08/08 05:47:46 <Knot4Prophet> so what constitutes "crime" across cultures, is ambiguous 05/08/08 05:47:49 <Severus379> Durkheim was a strong advocate of morality in society. He believed that having good strong morals would prevent individuals from 'disintegrating'. Disintegration would happen if the collective conscience became weak. The collective conscience was a term coined by Durkheim which meant that individuals shared common beliefs and sentiments. Without this consensus or agreement on fundamental moral 05/08/08 05:47:50 Relentless 258 is listening to DJ Rankin - Oceans Apart 05/08/08 05:47:50 <Knot4Prophet> not so with 'murder' 05/08/08 05:47:55 <Knot4Prophet> maybe, with stealing 05/08/08 05:48:08 <BEAR> Unjustified killing can't be considered moral 05/08/08 05:48:11 <Severus379> issues, social solidarity would be impossible and individuals could not be bound together to form an integrated social unit. In order to prevent society from disintegrating Durkheim believed that punishment was necessary. Punishment is 'a passionate reaction of graduated intensity to offences against the collective conscience 05/08/08 05:48:13 <Severus379> here 05/08/08 05:48:15 <Severus379> I stop now 05/08/08 05:48:36 <Knot4Prophet> well the "collective consciousness" is more aware of itself now than ever b4 05/08/08 05:48:37 <BEAR> Collective conscience? 05/08/08 05:48:44 <Knot4Prophet> with communications + technology 05/08/08 05:48:44 BEAR 999 steps back 05/08/08 05:48:45 <Severus379> Unlike conservatives who believed that the harshest possible punishment should be enforced to make men moral and preserve the status quo, Durkheim believed that only the necessary relevant amount of punishment was needed to threaten men to remain moral. Therefore, he believed that punishment was necessary in order to promote social cohesion and bind individuals together. 05/08/08 05:48:50 <Knot4Prophet> u said u were done! 05/08/08 05:48:58 <BEAR> You like reading. 05/08/08 05:49:00 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:49:07 <Severus379> collective conscience = the part we share with everyone 05/08/08 05:49:11 <Severus379> like shared beliefs 05/08/08 05:49:20 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> even though the aboriginals were from a long line of sister fuckers they did not have a word that equated to "mine" off topic but nonetheless interesting 05/08/08 05:49:22 <Knot4Prophet> and conscious of each other's existence 05/08/08 05:49:22 <Severus379> I am sone now 05/08/08 05:49:27 <Severus379> done 05/08/08 05:49:40 <Knot4Prophet> it is interesting, grrr 05/08/08 05:49:50 <Knot4Prophet> "possession" 05/08/08 05:49:55 <Knot4Prophet> ownership 05/08/08 05:49:57 <Knot4Prophet> what can we own? 05/08/08 05:50:05 <Knot4Prophet> what's in our hands, is about it 05/08/08 05:50:09 <Knot4Prophet> the rest is an agreement 05/08/08 05:50:12 <Knot4Prophet> with everyone else 05/08/08 05:50:20 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> they were probably the closest to communisim as can be in humans 05/08/08 05:50:24 <Severus379> that means they had a great collective conscience 05/08/08 05:50:40 <Knot4Prophet> they also fucked incestuously aye 05/08/08 05:50:46 <Knot4Prophet> neat combo 05/08/08 05:50:53 <Knot4Prophet> perhaps there is a correlation? 05/08/08 05:50:54 <Severus379> a large part of the "I" was a collective one 05/08/08 05:50:54 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:50:57 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> they still take anything thats not nailed down 05/08/08 05:51:00 <Knot4Prophet> heh 05/08/08 05:51:08 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 05:51:36 <Knot4Prophet> we only need to "threaten" ppl to be moral about things that are ambiguous 05/08/08 05:51:40 <Knot4Prophet> like "drug use" 05/08/08 05:51:49 <Knot4Prophet> cuz they dont see the logic 05/08/08 05:51:54 <Knot4Prophet> with murder, we c it 05/08/08 05:51:58 <Knot4Prophet> we need no threat 05/08/08 05:52:12 <Knot4Prophet> speaking to durkheim, there 05/08/08 05:52:18 <Severus379> I pay for my tickets in the tram 05/08/08 05:52:21 <Knot4Prophet> and his flawed analysis 05/08/08 05:52:26 <Severus379> just because of the threat, knot 05/08/08 05:52:42 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> do you honestly think there would be no rise in the murder rate if there was no consequence 05/08/08 05:52:44 <Knot4Prophet> that isnt morality 05/08/08 05:52:47 <Severus379> I should pay, because public transport is a social thing and all 05/08/08 05:52:50 <Severus379> by I only do it 05/08/08 05:52:54 <Severus379> or I get punished 05/08/08 05:52:56 <Knot4Prophet> ppl enforce it all on their own, grrr 05/08/08 05:53:03 <Knot4Prophet> if i go down the street, murdering everyone i c 05/08/08 05:53:06 <Knot4Prophet> what will happen to me? 05/08/08 05:53:09 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i said no consequence 05/08/08 05:53:10 <Knot4Prophet> irregardless of law 05/08/08 05:53:14 <Knot4Prophet> i'll be killed. 05/08/08 05:53:23 <Severus379> with consequence he doesn't mean law 05/08/08 05:53:25 <Knot4Prophet> that's how murder = suicide 05/08/08 05:53:27 <Severus379> he means not being killed 05/08/08 05:53:38 <Severus379> or sentenced 05/08/08 05:53:42 <Knot4Prophet> there's always a consequence 05/08/08 05:53:44 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i meant NO CONSEQUENCE 05/08/08 05:53:56 <Knot4Prophet> show me a society without consequence for murder 05/08/08 05:53:56 <Severus379> like in WW2 05/08/08 05:53:59 <Knot4Prophet> one that tried it 05/08/08 05:54:01 <Knot4Prophet> ? 05/08/08 05:54:06 <Severus379> there was no consequence for murdering jews 05/08/08 05:54:09 <Severus379> so people did it 05/08/08 05:54:10 <Knot4Prophet> sure there was 05/08/08 05:54:14 <Knot4Prophet> they hid it at first 05/08/08 05:54:15 <Severus379> that would happen now, too 05/08/08 05:54:17 <BEAR> I could tell you what i think is, more or less, right but there is no reason why you should pay any attention to it - Noam Chomsky 05/08/08 05:54:19 <Knot4Prophet> first they exported them away 05/08/08 05:54:22 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> not in nazi germany 05/08/08 05:54:28 <Knot4Prophet> then hitler's real plan came to fruition 05/08/08 05:54:33 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 05:54:36 <Knot4Prophet> to expunge them totally 05/08/08 05:54:38 <Severus379> there was no consequence any more 05/08/08 05:54:44 <Severus379> and people did it 05/08/08 05:54:49 <Knot4Prophet> only once he had significant military success 05/08/08 05:54:50 <Severus379> I think that's what Grrrr means 05/08/08 05:55:02 <Severus379> right? 05/08/08 05:55:02 <Knot4Prophet> ppl did it cuz they were told jews were root of all evil 05/08/08 05:55:06 <Knot4Prophet> they felt justified 05/08/08 05:55:10 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:55:10 <BEAR> Right. 05/08/08 05:55:11 <Knot4Prophet> economy was poor 05/08/08 05:55:16 <Knot4Prophet> lots of countries blamed jews 05/08/08 05:55:19 <BEAR> and gypsies 05/08/08 05:55:21 <Severus379> and they felt they were acting "moral" 05/08/08 05:55:21 <Knot4Prophet> cuz they were ppl without a nation 05/08/08 05:55:25 <BEAR> Jews + Gypsies 05/08/08 05:55:34 <BEAR> since A.D. 70 05/08/08 05:55:35 <Knot4Prophet> they felt that killing them would make the rest survive 05/08/08 05:55:38 <BEAR> scattered 05/08/08 05:55:40 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> homosexuals and cripples too 05/08/08 05:55:47 <Knot4Prophet> that was justified too 05/08/08 05:55:53 <Knot4Prophet> so they wouldnt dirty the gene pool 05/08/08 05:55:56 <Knot4Prophet> pro- survival 05/08/08 05:55:57 <Severus379> so "not killing" isn't necessarily part of the definition 05/08/08 05:56:01 <Severus379> NOT the definition 05/08/08 05:56:06 <Knot4Prophet> unjustified murder 05/08/08 05:56:09 <Knot4Prophet> is what i call murder 05/08/08 05:56:10 <Severus379> just when we will that definition it becomes part of it 05/08/08 05:56:17 <Severus379> but not the construct 05/08/08 05:56:21 <BEAR> unjustified killing? 05/08/08 05:56:23 <Severus379> you geddit now knot? 05/08/08 05:56:27 <Knot4Prophet> most ppl wouldnt do murder unless they could logically justify it 05/08/08 05:56:32 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 05:56:41 <Severus379> so DO NOT KILL is part of MOST societies 05/08/08 05:56:45 <Knot4Prophet> and most ppl cannot logically justify it 05/08/08 05:56:46 <Severus379> but not ALWAYS 05/08/08 05:56:51 <Severus379> so it is not the definition 05/08/08 05:57:00 <Severus379> it is the contents of the definition 05/08/08 05:57:00 <BEAR> Like if I choked ren to death because she couldn't breathe around my cock 05/08/08 05:57:02 <Knot4Prophet> what is not what's definition? 05/08/08 05:57:08 <BEAR> That would be justification for her husband to seek me out 05/08/08 05:57:20 BEAR 999 lays it down 05/08/08 05:57:32 <Severus379> do not kill isn't part of the universally applicable definition of morale 05/08/08 05:57:41 <Knot4Prophet> do not kill unjustiably is 05/08/08 05:57:46 <BEAR> Oh come on 05/08/08 05:57:47 <Severus379> ...sigh 05/08/08 05:57:47 <Knot4Prophet> and that's whats implied by do not kill 05/08/08 05:57:50 <Severus379> I give up 05/08/08 05:57:53 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 05:57:55 <Severus379> you don't get it 05/08/08 05:57:58 <Knot4Prophet> i do get it 05/08/08 05:58:03 <Severus379> no you don't 05/08/08 05:58:05 <Knot4Prophet> killing is ok if someone comes at me to kill me 05/08/08 05:58:07 <Severus379> you are a step behind 05/08/08 05:58:15 <Severus379> and you can't see it 05/08/08 05:58:23 <Knot4Prophet> if i can justify that someone may come at me, then i can justify killing them first 05/08/08 05:58:23 <Severus379> you fill that definition already 05/08/08 05:58:27 <Severus379> and can't see it 05/08/08 05:58:27 <BEAR> I wonder what the purpose of saying something like that is. 05/08/08 05:58:48 <Severus379> I think I'll stop here or I'll get aggressive 05/08/08 05:58:49 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 05:58:56 <BEAR> Then keep going woman! 05/08/08 05:59:01 <Severus379> nope 05/08/08 05:59:03 <BEAR> Get aggressive 05/08/08 05:59:07 <Knot4Prophet> when we say "thou shall not kill" does that mean dont kill the dude with the knife thats trying to slaughter ur family? 05/08/08 05:59:12 <Knot4Prophet> is that what u think? 05/08/08 05:59:14 <Knot4Prophet> seriously? 05/08/08 05:59:21 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 05:59:27 <Severus379> you don't get what I think 05/08/08 05:59:31 <Knot4Prophet> so its talking bout killing, but justifiably 05/08/08 05:59:32 <Severus379> I can't seem to explain 05/08/08 05:59:38 <Knot4Prophet> dont kill unjustifiably 05/08/08 05:59:42 <Severus379> or you can't seem to understand 05/08/08 05:59:44 <Severus379> one of the two 05/08/08 05:59:47 <Severus379> probably me 05/08/08 05:59:48 <Knot4Prophet> that's ur failure, not mine 05/08/08 05:59:51 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 05:59:52 <Knot4Prophet> i can understand any concept 05/08/08 05:59:58 <Severus379> maybe 05/08/08 06:00:06 <Knot4Prophet> if its reasonably presented 05/08/08 06:00:06 <Severus379> but I can't explain every concept 05/08/08 06:00:08 #c17#`~#c22#Kimbyr0x-666_61630 has left 05/08/08 06:00:09 Severus379 bows out 05/08/08 06:00:09 Relentless 258 is listening to Fearless Cru - I'm Not Playing A Game 05/08/08 06:00:14 <Knot4Prophet> then u shouldnt rely on it 05/08/08 06:00:18 <BEAR> Fearless Cru? 05/08/08 06:00:26 <Severus379> I can explain it in my mother tongue 05/08/08 06:00:31 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:00:34 Knot4Prophet 000 learns german 05/08/08 06:00:35 <Knot4Prophet> brb 05/08/08 06:00:38 <BEAR> ha 05/08/08 06:00:53 <BEAR> Das gut. 05/08/08 06:00:57 <Knot4Prophet> k, sprechen de deutshcshehhshhhe? 05/08/08 06:01:17 <BEAR> .. 05/08/08 06:01:18 <Knot4Prophet> en francais? 05/08/08 06:01:27 <Severus379> ja 05/08/08 06:01:31 <Severus379> deutsch ist besser 05/08/08 06:01:34 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:01:36 <BEAR> No it's not. 05/08/08 06:01:45 <Severus379> nur für mich 05/08/08 06:01:50 <BEAR> Ok 05/08/08 06:01:59 mickey572_27765 (207.192.209.233) (Cable 813 files) has entered 05/08/08 06:01:59 <Severus379> Muttersprache 05/08/08 06:02:00 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> your english was fine ren 05/08/08 06:02:07 <Knot4Prophet> yo mick, wb 05/08/08 06:02:08 <BEAR> Agreed 05/08/08 06:02:09 <Severus379> obviously not 05/08/08 06:02:12 <BEAR> No it was 05/08/08 06:02:18 <BEAR> hey mickey 05/08/08 06:02:19 <Knot4Prophet> ur command of english is excellent 05/08/08 06:02:33 <BEAR> Better than mine. 05/08/08 06:02:37 <Severus379> haha 05/08/08 06:02:38 <Knot4Prophet> agreed 05/08/08 06:02:41 <Knot4Prophet> slightly 05/08/08 06:02:43 <Severus379> stop taking the mickey 05/08/08 06:02:52 <Severus379> =making fun 05/08/08 06:02:52 BEAR 999 takes it where he likes 05/08/08 06:02:56 <mickey572> what ? 05/08/08 06:02:58 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> knot is of the opinion some morals are instictive and that's the end of the story 05/08/08 06:03:06 <Severus379> taking the mickey means making fun of something 05/08/08 06:03:06 <mickey572> lol 05/08/08 06:03:09 <Severus379> here anways 05/08/08 06:03:18 <mickey572> oh..........ok 05/08/08 06:03:22 <BEAR> Well I haven't been able to show Knot a situation where that wasn't the case, Grr. 05/08/08 06:03:26 <Knot4Prophet> i dont "want" to believe that morality is instinctualy, i see it 05/08/08 06:03:26 <BEAR> and I doubt you could either. 05/08/08 06:03:32 <Severus379> we have, bear 05/08/08 06:03:36 <Knot4Prophet> no u havent 05/08/08 06:03:47 Severus379 screams 05/08/08 06:03:49 <BEAR> lol 05/08/08 06:03:56 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> the prison system is full of exceptions to the rule 05/08/08 06:03:57 Severus379 clutches her head 05/08/08 06:04:14 <Knot4Prophet> and so are birth deformities an exception to the 'human' rule 05/08/08 06:04:15 <Knot4Prophet> and? 05/08/08 06:04:20 <Knot4Prophet> there are no humans? 05/08/08 06:04:24 <Severus379> ... 05/08/08 06:04:33 <Knot4Prophet> we cannot generalize about humanity? 05/08/08 06:04:40 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> show me the murder gene 05/08/08 06:04:41 <Knot4Prophet> because of the few deformities? 05/08/08 06:04:48 <Severus379> we can generalise about certain definitions 05/08/08 06:04:51 <Severus379> I can anway 05/08/08 06:04:56 <Knot4Prophet> ur the one that's saying that 'murder' is instinctual, not me 05/08/08 06:04:56 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:04:57 <BEAR> Saying that there are no instinctual morals because we fuck the system of application up is flawed 05/08/08 06:05:02 <Knot4Prophet> u show me the murder gene 05/08/08 06:05:02 <Knot4Prophet> ( 05/08/08 06:05:30 <Knot4Prophet> i say it isnt instinctual, so how can there be a gene for it? 05/08/08 06:05:32 <Knot4Prophet> dont be silly 05/08/08 06:05:38 BEAR 999 trys his best 05/08/08 06:05:39 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> there is no murder gene, it is not instinct 05/08/08 06:05:49 <Knot4Prophet> right, survive is instinct tho 05/08/08 06:06:00 <BEAR> Adrenaline 05/08/08 06:06:01 <Knot4Prophet> and add to that awareness and empathy, and we have morality 05/08/08 06:06:02 <BEAR> fight flight 05/08/08 06:06:02 <Severus379> I am saying that when defining moral, murder isn't necessarily included. It is more abstract than that. What knot does, is filling the abstract term and making that the definition, even though it doesn't always apply 05/08/08 06:06:10 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> not so knot 05/08/08 06:06:22 <Knot4Prophet> im saying murder is the basis of instinctual morality 05/08/08 06:06:24 <Knot4Prophet> how not so? 05/08/08 06:06:38 Severus379 winces 05/08/08 06:06:44 <BEAR> Have you submitted this to meriam-webster yet 05/08/08 06:06:44 Severus379 cringes 05/08/08 06:06:47 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> there is no instincual morality 05/08/08 06:06:53 <Severus379> there is 05/08/08 06:06:55 <Knot4Prophet> is survival instinctual? 05/08/08 06:06:57 <Severus379> but it can be overcome 05/08/08 06:07:00 <BEAR> murder? 05/08/08 06:07:00 <Knot4Prophet> or do we learn that too 05/08/08 06:07:03 Knot4Prophet 000 scoffs 05/08/08 06:07:04 <BEAR> hmm 05/08/08 06:07:04 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if it was instictual we wouldnt need morals 05/08/08 06:07:12 <Knot4Prophet> we dont "need" morals 05/08/08 06:07:14 <Knot4Prophet> we have them 05/08/08 06:07:19 <Severus379> so it isn't necessarily included in the definition of moral. Cause it can be overcome 05/08/08 06:07:26 <Knot4Prophet> only if justified 05/08/08 06:07:31 <Knot4Prophet> and then it aint murder anymore 05/08/08 06:07:33 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> why if we were instinctivly moral? 05/08/08 06:07:43 <Knot4Prophet> why what? 05/08/08 06:07:44 <BEAR> What about extreme confinment knot 05/08/08 06:07:46 Relentless 258 is listening to Fearless Cru - Hit Them Up 05/08/08 06:07:47 <BEAR> solitary confinement 05/08/08 06:07:54 <BEAR> could that be worse than murder? 05/08/08 06:07:59 <mickey572> tell me knot......what would you have done 05/08/08 06:08:04 <BEAR> say abandonment? complete? 05/08/08 06:08:14 <Knot4Prophet> we are instinctively pro-survival so we are instinctively moral, because of it 05/08/08 06:08:18 <mickey572> one day 05/08/08 06:08:21 <BEAR> Right 05/08/08 06:08:24 <Knot4Prophet> idk of any such case, bear 05/08/08 06:08:33 <BEAR> and the opposite of that would be uninsticual murder 05/08/08 06:08:35 <Knot4Prophet> we'd only be guessing 05/08/08 06:08:46 <Knot4Prophet> there is no society of one 05/08/08 06:09:00 <mickey572> come on knot........... 05/08/08 06:09:14 <BEAR> instinctively prosurvival ---- Un-instinctive murder. 05/08/08 06:09:21 <mickey572> what if you were on one of those planes 05/08/08 06:09:29 <mickey572> tell me 05/08/08 06:09:29 <BEAR> You're saying that is the spectrum 05/08/08 06:09:44 <BEAR> instinctively prosurvival <--------------------------------------------------> Un-instinctive murder. 05/08/08 06:09:48 <Knot4Prophet> that's one way, sure bear 05/08/08 06:10:00 <Knot4Prophet> one dimensional, but illustrative nonetheless 05/08/08 06:10:08 <BEAR> you're welcome. 05/08/08 06:10:09 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> morality has never been about the individual bear, only the impact the individual has on the group 05/08/08 06:10:10 </T> unlurk just to say hi (back to sleep) 05/08/08 06:10:18 <Knot4Prophet> hey demi 05/08/08 06:10:25 <Severus379> hi demi 05/08/08 06:10:26 <BEAR> Hey, Demon, sleep well. 05/08/08 06:10:27 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:10:29 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> hi muppet 05/08/08 06:10:55 <mickey572> lol.......ignore it then 05/08/08 06:11:00 mickey572_27765 has left 05/08/08 06:11:22 <Knot4Prophet> grr agrees that he doesnt murder cuz of empathy, but doesnt extend that experience to anyone else, when he assumes everyone else would murder unjustifably, unless they were "taught" 05/08/08 06:11:28 <Knot4Prophet> were u "taught" to empathize? 05/08/08 06:11:30 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:11:49 <Knot4Prophet> why do u assume no one is like u? 05/08/08 06:12:03 <Knot4Prophet> im like u, in that respect 05/08/08 06:12:05 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i have no idea why people murder knot, nor why others don't 05/08/08 06:12:09 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:12:09 mickey572_27765 (207.192.209.233) (Cable 813 files) has entered 05/08/08 06:12:22 Severus379 is listening to Johnny Cash - When The Man Comes Around 05/08/08 06:12:26 <mickey572> ignore..... as in ignorance 05/08/08 06:12:31 mickey572_27765 has left 05/08/08 06:12:31 <Knot4Prophet> then u cant form an opinion on whether murder is moral or not, or instinctual or not 05/08/08 06:12:36 <Knot4Prophet> with any validity 05/08/08 06:12:54 <Knot4Prophet> silly mick, always crying for attention 05/08/08 06:13:20 <BEAR> Like we all do 05/08/08 06:13:26 <V> Later. 05/08/08 06:13:27 <BEAR> just.. more pathetically 05/08/08 06:13:28 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i do know that generally speaking people will do what they are allowed to get away with 05/08/08 06:13:29 <BEAR> Later 05/08/08 06:13:29 V-Loc (Blah)626_11995 has left 05/08/08 06:13:46 <Knot4Prophet> i dont extend that to murder 05/08/08 06:13:54 <BEAR> I'd extend that to capitalism 05/08/08 06:13:59 <Knot4Prophet> and i dont include most crimes among "instinctual morality" 05/08/08 06:14:08 <BEAR> extreme 05/08/08 06:14:13 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> if there were no consequence for murder it would happen more often 05/08/08 06:14:14 <Severus379> you read Kant's view? 05/08/08 06:14:17 <Knot4Prophet> so whatever ur talking bout 'getting away with' isnt in my sphere of instinctual morality 05/08/08 06:14:25 <BEAR> Emmanuel Kunt 05/08/08 06:14:27 <Knot4Prophet> u dont know that grr 05/08/08 06:14:33 <Knot4Prophet> show me a society without consequence 05/08/08 06:14:35 <Severus379> aye, him 05/08/08 06:14:37 <Knot4Prophet> ur just hypothesizing 05/08/08 06:14:57 <Knot4Prophet> using unreal examples serves no one 05/08/08 06:15:02 <BEAR> "I am not concerned with what I should do as much as I am concern with what i should know is God's will for me to do" - Kunt 05/08/08 06:15:04 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> it is a fair assumption based on human behaviour 05/08/08 06:15:05 <Knot4Prophet> like hitchers' 'society of one' 05/08/08 06:15:12 <Knot4Prophet> i dont think its fair 05/08/08 06:15:19 <Knot4Prophet> based on history and population 05/08/08 06:15:23 <Knot4Prophet> and biology 05/08/08 06:15:39 <Severus379> "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." 05/08/08 06:15:43 <BEAR> I started to read fear an trembling and listend to a lecture on Emmanuel Kant and he is very lacking in a lot of ways 05/08/08 06:15:45 <Knot4Prophet> ppl 'get away' with things that are ambiguously immoral 05/08/08 06:15:55 <BEAR> he developed good ground for his contemporaries and betters. 05/08/08 06:15:57 <BEAR> not much else. 05/08/08 06:16:07 <Knot4Prophet> so brushing my teeth should be a universal law? 05/08/08 06:16:08 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:16:12 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> some people get away with murder 05/08/08 06:16:14 <Severus379> aye 05/08/08 06:16:20 <Severus379> everyone should do it 05/08/08 06:16:22 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:16:29 <Knot4Prophet> most ppl dont even attempt it, grr 05/08/08 06:16:32 <Knot4Prophet> nor would they 05/08/08 06:16:35 <Knot4Prophet> law or no 05/08/08 06:16:43 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> how do you know that? 05/08/08 06:16:46 <Knot4Prophet> the consequence is always there, and so is the empathy 05/08/08 06:16:58 <Knot4Prophet> because u can empathize and not murder, is my example 05/08/08 06:17:02 <Knot4Prophet> the same applies to me 05/08/08 06:17:04 <Knot4Prophet> and to sev 05/08/08 06:17:06 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> what becomes justifiable murder? 05/08/08 06:17:11 <Knot4Prophet> y should i not extend that to others? 05/08/08 06:17:15 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> an argument? 05/08/08 06:17:25 <Knot4Prophet> when i logically deduce that survival is threatened 05/08/08 06:17:29 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> drinking someone elses drink? 05/08/08 06:17:34 <Knot4Prophet> murder is then justiable 05/08/08 06:17:39 <Knot4Prophet> i cannnot justify that, nope 05/08/08 06:17:44 <Knot4Prophet> can u? 05/08/08 06:17:47 <Severus379> here: principle of universalization, one that intends to set the conditions for impartial judgment insofar as it "constrains all affected to adopt the perspectives of all others in the balancing of interests" 05/08/08 06:18:06 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> but peole kill for the reasons i have just mentioned and feel it's justified 05/08/08 06:18:21 <Knot4Prophet> 99.9% dont 05/08/08 06:18:27 <Knot4Prophet> im talking bout them 05/08/08 06:18:37 <Knot4Prophet> the bulk of humanity 05/08/08 06:18:42 <Severus379> 99% don't = it isn't the definition 05/08/08 06:18:43 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i'm talking about everyone 05/08/08 06:18:54 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> humans 05/08/08 06:18:57 <Knot4Prophet> ur talking bout some few, and pretending that is everyone 05/08/08 06:18:57 <Severus379> 99% means that it almost always is contents of the definition 05/08/08 06:19:05 <Knot4Prophet> im talking bout the bulk, and pretending that is everyone 05/08/08 06:19:08 <Severus379> but it isn't it 05/08/08 06:19:10 <Severus379> sigh 05/08/08 06:19:14 Severus379 bows out again 05/08/08 06:19:20 <Knot4Prophet> the rest is negligible 05/08/08 06:19:20 <choco_forever456> 05/08/08 06:19:35 <Knot4Prophet> lol 05/08/08 06:19:36 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> no it's not and that is your mistake 05/08/08 06:19:44 <Knot4Prophet> how is it my mistake? 05/08/08 06:19:44 <Severus379> yes 05/08/08 06:19:47 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 06:19:50 <Knot4Prophet> is murder successful? 05/08/08 06:19:54 <Severus379> it means it's not exact 05/08/08 06:19:56 <Knot4Prophet> has population gone down? 05/08/08 06:19:59 <Knot4Prophet> do most of us murder? 05/08/08 06:20:00 <Severus379> cause it doesn't always happen 05/08/08 06:20:01 <Knot4Prophet> nope. 05/08/08 06:20:05 <Severus379> means it's not exact 05/08/08 06:20:09 <Knot4Prophet> i never said it was 05/08/08 06:20:14 <Knot4Prophet> i allow for deformities 05/08/08 06:20:16 <Knot4Prophet> so does biology 05/08/08 06:20:17 <Severus379> like a mathematical law with somethign missing 05/08/08 06:20:21 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> the exception to the rule is what makes the rule open to interpretation 05/08/08 06:20:28 <Knot4Prophet> all biology doesnt want to 'survive' either, but most does 05/08/08 06:20:28 <Severus379> or like when you give only one side of the triangle 05/08/08 06:20:31 <Severus379> and one angle 05/08/08 06:20:46 <Knot4Prophet> rules are about explaining phenomena 05/08/08 06:20:47 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> deformities can be explained genetically 05/08/08 06:20:47 <Severus379> it sometimes applies and sometimes not 05/08/08 06:21:04 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> murderes can't 05/08/08 06:21:09 <Knot4Prophet> could they be explained genetically 1200 years ago? 05/08/08 06:21:17 <Knot4Prophet> does that mean they didnt exist, then? 05/08/08 06:21:23 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> what difference does that make? 05/08/08 06:21:28 <Knot4Prophet> did the electron not exist then, either? 05/08/08 06:21:43 <Knot4Prophet> ur saying that because they can be explained, that they are valid 05/08/08 06:21:47 <Knot4Prophet> whereas murder isnt 05/08/08 06:21:53 <Knot4Prophet> cuz it cant be explained, correct? 05/08/08 06:22:00 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 06:22:03 <Knot4Prophet> not u, him 05/08/08 06:22:10 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:22:15 <Knot4Prophet> he said 'murders cant' 05/08/08 06:22:17 <Knot4Prophet> see that? 05/08/08 06:22:17 <Severus379> oh, yeah it might be correct for him 05/08/08 06:22:19 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:22:31 <Knot4Prophet> so because we cant explain it today means it dont exist? 05/08/08 06:22:35 <Knot4Prophet> come now 05/08/08 06:22:40 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> murder in not a genetic condition, it is choice pure and simple 05/08/08 06:22:52 <Knot4Prophet> maybe ppl thought that about deformities too 05/08/08 06:22:55 <Knot4Prophet> back in the day 05/08/08 06:23:05 <Knot4Prophet> they wanted to be deformed 05/08/08 06:23:07 <Knot4Prophet> eh? 05/08/08 06:23:15 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 06:23:16 <Severus379> or their parents cursed them 05/08/08 06:23:44 <Knot4Prophet> we all understand surivival and non surivival, we all have awareness, and that is the source of morality 05/08/08 06:23:53 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> there are psycological conditions that compel peaople to murder but in the end it still comes down to choice 05/08/08 06:23:55 <Knot4Prophet> without those, there is no morality 05/08/08 06:24:06 <Knot4Prophet> a brain tumor is a choice? 05/08/08 06:24:09 <Knot4Prophet> since when 05/08/08 06:24:12 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> 05/08/08 06:24:18 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> lag 05/08/08 06:24:26 <Knot4Prophet> smooth on this end 05/08/08 06:24:57 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> insane lag 05/08/08 06:25:01 <Knot4Prophet> ... 05/08/08 06:25:02 <Knot4Prophet> ... 05/08/08 06:25:02 <Severus379> okay knot 05/08/08 06:25:03 <Knot4Prophet> ... 05/08/08 06:25:09 <Severus379> I found the definition of definition 05/08/08 06:25:11 <Severus379> look 05/08/08 06:25:13 <Severus379> A definition is a statement of the meaning of a word or phrase. The term to be defined is known as the definiendum (Latin: that which is to be defined). The words which define it are known as the definiens (Latin: that which is doing the defining) 05/08/08 06:25:27 <Severus379> An extensional definition, also called a denotative definition, of a concept or term specifies its extension. It is, a list naming every object that is a member of a specific set. 05/08/08 06:25:33 <Severus379> focus on EVERY 05/08/08 06:25:36 <Severus379> means I win 05/08/08 06:25:49 Severus379 quickly goes 05/08/08 06:25:52 <Knot4Prophet> lmao 05/08/08 06:26:01 <Severus379> see? 05/08/08 06:26:04 <Severus379> EVERY 05/08/08 06:26:10 <Severus379> EEEEVEEERYYYYYYYY 05/08/08 06:26:13 <Severus379> not 99% 05/08/08 06:26:19 <Knot4Prophet> to define something means to explain it 05/08/08 06:26:27 ¤torquf¤141 calls Seve so they can pull a Pan 05/08/08 06:26:27 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 06:26:33 <Knot4Prophet> book = magazine? yes or no 05/08/08 06:26:33 <Severus379> that's an EXPLANATION 05/08/08 06:26:45 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> i seriously doubt anyone has commited a murder because they are genetically compelled 05/08/08 06:27:02 Severus379 won 05/08/08 06:27:08 <choco_forever456> lol 05/08/08 06:27:12 <Knot4Prophet> i never said they are genetically compelled to commit murder 05/08/08 06:27:16 <choco_forever456> shag her to silence knot 05/08/08 06:27:20 <choco_forever456> jk ren 05/08/08 06:27:21 <choco_forever456> ;p 05/08/08 06:27:27 <Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrnix666> gg volleyball 05/08/08 06:27:32 <Knot4Prophet> does the term "people" include fetuses, sev? 05/08/08 06:27:33 <Severus379> you said it's 99% therefore you based a DEFINITION on that number 05/08/08 06:27:36 <Knot4Prophet> yes or no 05/08/08 06:27:37 <Severus379> and that is WRONG 05/08/08 06:27:42 Severus379 won 05/08/08 06:27:43 <Knot4Prophet> does it? 05/08/08 06:27:46 <Knot4Prophet> yes or no 05/08/08 06:27:49 Severus379 won 05/08/08 06:27:49 <BEAR> Knot, what do you think of fluoride? 05/08/08 06:27:55 <Knot4Prophet> its poison 05/08/08 06:27:58 <Knot4Prophet> yes or no, stef? 05/08/08 06:28:01 <choco_forever456> it can be toxic 05/08/08 06:28:04 <Severus379> yes or no what? 05/08/08 06:28:11 <Knot4Prophet> does the term "people" include fetuses, sev? 05/08/08 06:28:17 <BEAR> What do you think of it being in tap water 05/08/08 06:28:25 <Severus379> erm... 05/08/08 06:28:32 <Severus379> in some societies it does 05/08/08 06:28:38 <Severus379> and in others it doesn't 05/08/08 06:28:55 <Knot4Prophet> so what constitutes 'people' is not necessarily complete 05/08/08 06:29:02 <Severus379> you can determine a moral standard by looking how certain groups react to abortion 05/08/08 06:29:18 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 06:29:26 <Severus379> you are not winning this with that shite 05/08/08 06:29:28 <Knot4Prophet> and i also said that murder is not seen in ALL cultures 05/08/08 06:29:32 <Knot4Prophet> every single one 05/08/08 06:29:36 <Severus379> yup 05/08/08 06:29:40 <Knot4Prophet> its taboo 05/08/08 06:29:43 <Knot4Prophet> in all 05/08/08 06:29:43 <Severus379> so it isn't part of the definition 05/08/08 06:29:47 <Knot4Prophet> so it is 05/08/08 06:29:47 <Severus379> of moral 05/08/08 06:29:52 <Knot4Prophet> its in all cultures 05/08/08 06:29:53 <Severus379> it can't be 05/08/08 06:29:56 <Knot4Prophet> the taboo against it 05/08/08 06:29:58 <Severus379> definition means ALL 05/08/08 06:30:00 <Knot4Prophet> so its primal 05/08/08 06:30:01 #c8#U#c1#2#c8#ME#c1#2#c8#U#c7#131_14297 (142.162.159.179) (DSL 12 files) has entered 05/08/08 06:30:01 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] U2ME2U : 142.162.159.179 : 8708 05/08/08 06:30:02 <Severus379> EVERY aspect 05/08/08 06:30:04 <Knot4Prophet> all cultures, yup 05/08/08 06:30:06 <Knot4Prophet> every one 05/08/08 06:30:08 <Severus379> no 05/08/08 06:30:11 <Severus379> ? 05/08/08 06:30:12 <Severus379> NO! 05/08/08 06:30:17 <Knot4Prophet> yup, they all agree that unjustifiable murder is wrong 05/08/08 06:30:20 <Knot4Prophet> show me where they dont 05/08/08 06:30:23 <Knot4Prophet> list some 05/08/08 06:30:25 <Severus379> you are just trying to confuse me 05/08/08 06:30:28 Severus379 turns away 05/08/08 06:30:28 <Knot4Prophet> loll 05/08/08 06:30:37 <Knot4Prophet> yo u2 wb 05/08/08 06:30:43 <c8> hey knot 05/08/08 06:30:47 <Knot4Prophet> hows things? 05/08/08 06:30:51 The_Art_Of_Insane_skippin'...133_58756 (82.29.125.231) (Cable 6 files) has entered 05/08/08 06:30:51 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] The_Art_Of_Insane_skippin'... : 82.29.125.231 : 6664 05/08/08 06:30:54 <Knot4Prophet> wb arty 05/08/08 06:30:56 <c8> great 05/08/08 06:30:59 <c8> and you 05/08/08 06:30:59 <Knot4Prophet> awesome 05/08/08 06:31:04 <Knot4Prophet> great here too thanx 05/08/08 06:31:06 <c8> kewl 05/08/08 06:31:14 <c8> whats the weather like there today 05/08/08 06:31:16 <The_Art_Of_Insane_skippin'...133> ta 05/08/08 06:31:25 <Severus379> well I'm off 05/08/08 06:31:26 <Knot4Prophet> cloudy with likely showers again today 05/08/08 06:31:30 <Severus379> knowing that I won 05/08/08 06:31:33 <Knot4Prophet> hey thanx for the chat, sev 05/08/08 06:31:35 <Severus379> so I'm off 05/08/08 06:31:36 <c8> same sort of thing here too 05/08/08 06:31:41 <Severus379> was nice, knot 05/08/08 06:31:43 <c8> l8r sevrus 05/08/08 06:31:44 <Severus379> cause I won 05/08/08 06:31:47 <Knot4Prophet> the one who declares winning first is the one who is usually the loser 05/08/08 06:31:53 <Severus379> see you, me 05/08/08 06:31:53 <Knot4Prophet> 99.9% of the time 05/08/08 06:31:55 <Severus379> 05/08/08 06:31:58 <choco_forever456> yes you did 05/08/08 06:32:03 <Severus379> exactly 05/08/08 06:32:07 <choco_forever456> you are our fav ren 05/08/08 06:32:10 <choco_forever456> you too knot 05/08/08 06:32:13 <choco_forever456> lulz 05/08/08 06:32:16 <Severus379> 99.9% means it's not part of a definition 05/08/08 06:32:18 Knot4Prophet 000 rolls eyes 05/08/08 06:32:23 <Severus379> lol 05/08/08 06:32:25 <Severus379> I'm off 05/08/08 06:32:33 Severus379 is off, head high 05/08/08 06:32:34 <Knot4Prophet> well ur among the ones who are 'losers' for declaring a win 05/08/08 06:32:38 <Knot4Prophet> 05/08/08 06:32:40 <Knot4Prophet> enjoy 05/08/08 06:32:42 <BEAR> flouride and aspartame are poisons 05/08/08 06:32:45 <BEAR> right? 05/08/08 06:32:46 <choco_forever456> yees 05/08/08 06:32:48 <Knot4Prophet> aye 05/08/08 06:32:48 <torquf> off, huh? that explains the smell 05/08/08 06:32:51 <torquf> : )> 05/08/08 06:32:51 <choco_forever456> in certain amounts 05/08/08 06:32:58 <BEAR> Why is it in my water+drinks 05/08/08 06:33:00 <Knot4Prophet> lol fuq, 'mornin 05/08/08 06:33:04 <BEAR> Hey fuk 05/08/08 06:33:05 <choco_forever456> cos they are jerks 05/08/08 06:33:09 <BEAR> hm 05/08/08 06:33:15 <torquf> hey Knot 05/08/08 06:33:18 <torquf> hey Bear 05/08/08 06:33:19 <BEAR> What purpose does flouride serve in water 05/08/08 06:33:20 <BEAR> and 05/08/08 06:33:24 <BEAR> how do I get it out of my water 05/08/08 06:33:26 BEAR 999 looks at knot 05/08/08 06:33:36 mickey572_27765 (207.192.209.233) (Cable 813 files) has entered 05/08/08 06:33:36 ApostaScythe 000 [Admin] mickey : 207.192.209.233 : 3593 05/08/08 06:33:40 <choco_forever456> I had 2 coleagues working on water hygiene and they were testing samples of water 05/08/08 06:34:00 <choco_forever456> they said that if the population would know whats in it , it would create panik 05/08/08 06:34:09 <choco_forever456> but thats Romania 05/08/08 06:34:13 <choco_forever456> dunno about Canada 05/08/08 06:34:18 <Knot4Prophet> when u can show me that survival isnt instinctual, i'll believe u that morality isnt either, sev. and when grr can show me y we should generalize from exceptions, which is fallacious, i'll agree with him, too The data for murders in Canada shows a rate of 1.9 murders per 100 000 population which means that 99.9981% of people did not commit murder. If the data were a normal distribution (and im not saying that they are) and one was to employ standard deviation as a measure of the spread of data (as Grrr did) one would find that this 99.9981% of people who do not murder covers not one but FOUR standard deviations (four standard deviations from the mean of a normal distribution include 99.994% of data). This makes the number of people who actually murder statistically insignificant. Grrr cannot hope to use standard deviation of the population who do and don't commit murder as any type of argument in favour of a statistical correlation between humans and murdering. 99.9981% don't murder. Statistics support that humans are not murderers. Sev argues that because "instinctual morality" does not include every single person, that "instinctual morality" for the 99.9981% of people is somehow flawed. Sev's first statment, at the outset of the argument, was that "all morality is learned" yet we can all be sure that some people who are exposed to teachings of morality do not "learn" it, which means that her statement "all morality is learned" also fails her own test of what is definitive of a group. Surely she cannot hope to hold my statement that "some morality is instinctual" to a higher standard of "definitiveness" than does she of her own statements. Yet this was her basis for "winning" the argument, because she wished that exceptions break the rule, which they don't, especially when statistically insignificant. So, Sev, when I said that people in arguments who declare themselves the winner, usually aren't, this is borne out by your example. Grrrr says that because some people murder others proves that none of the other 99.9981% of people could know instinctively that it is "wrong" (anti-survival) to murder. Less than 2 people in 100 000 (in Canada) murder someone, annually. Grrr also claims that morality is "learned." My example using Sev's statement shows that some people exposed to teachings of morality do not "learn" it. Where then does these people's, these murderers'(for example), morality come from? If they see no morality at all, no right or wrong, then they didn't "learn" anything. If they do see right and wrong, just it differs from the 99.9981% (for murder for example), and they didn't "learn" this anomalous morality, from where did they get it? If Sev wants to limit her statement that "all morality is learned" by applying it only to those who actually learned it and discluding the rest, she fails her own test of validity because I, too, can apply "instinctive morality" to only those who have the instinct (99.9981%) If Sev and Grrr wish to apply exceptions in order to invalidate my assertion that morality is instinctual, they are, at the same time, invalidating their own assertions that morality is learned. Why don't some people learn it? Who cares? They are statistically insignificant, too. So barring all other data, their initial assertion that morality is learned, based on their own criteria, are no more or less valid than my own assertion that (some) morality is instinctual. I then went on to support my argument that the behaviour more closely allied with survival/nonsurvival is the behaviour more closely associated with instinct. I supported this argument in multiple ways. First I gave the preconditions for morality to exist: Multiple Entities, Life/Death, Awareness. Secondly, I distinguished between "instinctual morality" and "ambiguous morality." Thirdly, I examined all cultures for their rules on "murder" and Sev and Grrr could provide not one culture who promoted (unjustifiable) murder. Finally, I extrapolated from their point of view, reductio ad absurdum, that if murder were truly statistically significant, the human population couldn't logically have increased so successfully. Looking at historical figures we see estimates of World Population in 1750 to be around 800 million people. Compare that to now, 250 years later, and we see almost TEN TIMES that population, now. If murderers were statistically significant (which I've already proven they aren't using statistics) then we surely couldn't expect such an explosion in human population during periods which covered hundreds of wars (i.e. includes ambiguous but justifiable murders as well as unjustified murders). Fallacy: There is no alternative (False Dilemma) The assertion that there is no alternative is an example of the false dichotomy taken to its ultimate extreme, in which the alternatives are reduced to one, the proposal of the speaker. Of course the speaker does not believe there are no alternatives otherwise he would not bother to argue the point; rather he opposes the alternatives and seeks to dismiss them by denying their existence. This fallacy is the failing of both their arguments. They steadfastly claim that all morality is purely learned behaviour, allowing for no alternative, when one may exist. What is particularly galling about Sev and Grrr's position, is that not only can they not support the assertion that "all morality is learned" and therefore not instinctual, they nonetheless assert that they absolutely know this is a fact. There is already a basis for my assertion that some human behaviour is instinctual, pre-existing in other human behaviours which are known to be instinctual. Sex is a prime example of instinctual behaviour. We do not need to "learn" how to do it. My assertion that some morality (also behaviour) is instinctual and is supported, in part, by this alone. Still, I do not rule out morality that is learned, and I clearly distinguish morality that is instinctual from morality that is learned (ambiguous) by aligning the morality/immorality with survival/non-survival. The more obvious is the link between behaviour and survival, the more likely that this behaviour is treated similarly across all cultures, the more likely that this behaviour is instinctual. When 2 people in 100 000 in Canada murder someone, it is not statistically significant. It is statistically negligible by any statistical standards. Because there exist people who do not possess instinctual morality does not invalidate the generalization that morality is instinctual. If it does, then their statement that "all morality is learned" is equally invalid, because all exposed to the teachings of morality do not learn it. Whatever method Sev and Grrr would like to employ to disregard the exceptions to their generalization that morality is learned, I too will apply to the exceptions that (some) morality is instinctual. Grrr says that people do not murder because they fear the consequences, yet he himself admits that his reasoning for not murdering is not because he fears consequences. He claims his reason for not murdering people is because he can "empathize" with them, which is an innate ability based on awareness, not learned. I agree that he does not murder because of this. I too do not murder because of this. Yet for some reason, in order to justify his claim that morality is learned, even though his morality for the most important (egregious) factor in morality - murder, Grr suggests his isn't based on anything learned (empathy), yet somehow everyone else's morality regarding murder IS based on learned morality. Utter nonsense. I can understand a person not expecting everyone else to be just like themselves but there is no basis for assuming that NO ONE else is like themselves. Sev and Grrr's argument both rest on exceptions to instinctual morality. I've shown exceptions to "learned morality" which clearly defeat their own argument against me. If they tried to say "all morality which exists is learned" I would just mirror the statement and say "some morality which exists is instinctual" with both parties reducing their exceptions to negligibility. But for them both to be so insistent that morality is learned without supporting the claim and even admitting to facts which disprove it as Grrr re: empathy and Sev's own contradiction: 05/08/08 02:39:29 <BUSTA> you are NOT born with morals or values 05/08/08 02:39:33 <BUSTA> you must learn both 05/08/08 02:39:37 <Severus379> of course 05/08/08 02:39:43 <BUSTA> they are simple things but you must be taught them 05/08/08 02:39:49 <Severus379> I know 05/08/08 04:56:14 <Severus379> course there are instintual morals, but they don't necessarily determine the whole term morality You are exactly right, Sev, in the latter statement. That statement alone is in perfect agreement with my thesis, that "some" (not all) morality is instinctual. One final thought. Humans instinctively have sex, procreate. Because some do not have sex does this mean that sex isn't instinctual? Lol. Certainly not. |
Author: | Steffi [ Fri May 09, 2008 7:14 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Okay, let's start this from scratch. We are trying to define "moral" and "morality". Define, in this case means: to state exactly the meaning of a word or phrase (Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, Oxford University Press. Fifth Edition, 1995, p.294). While Knot has attempted to explain, I attempt to define. Explain something means to give or be a reason for sth; to account for sth (Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, Oxford University Press. Fifth Edition, 1995, p.389). Definitions attempt to be universally applicable, whereas explanations illustrate. Anyway. Moral. It is difficult to define, because it is a theoretical term. One could say, that moral is the entirety of binding conventions and ethical norms which regulate interpersonal relationships. It is a system, which regulates social life. It is based on the particular tradition, religion and form of society. Knot is convinced that is based on (mainly) instincts which I have seen no proof of. Let's see. The code in which we can see that moral in society is enhanced is acknowledgement and disacknowledgement. Or as Knot put it, right and wrong. Of course, each group of people, each society has their own ideas of morality. What the mafia considers wrong is right to other groups of people and vice versa. Nothing to do with instinct, right? And which instinct exactly is the one that determines morality? Knot thinks survival. Possibly yes, possibly no. So many things are considered immoral or wrong, are disacknowledged that have nothing to do with survival. Smacking? Time-Outs? Leaving a baby to cry? Stealing copyright? Being an atheist? Or a muslim? What does that have to do with instinct and survival? Sexual instincts tell us to breed, to survive, and yet, Catholics think it is immoral for a priest to do so. If we can overcome sexual instincts in defining morality, we can overcome the instinct to survive, too. Hence, it cannot be the "definition", not strictly speaking. The Koran states on averagely every third page that non-believers shall be murdered. This is considered "moral". Basically, all human action that is NOT disacknowledged, not punished, sanctioned, does not cause outrage, disgust, etc, can be considered "moral". All behaviour that is sanctioned, considered wrong, causes moral outrage, etc, is immoral. The morality of a society can be best measured by what is being punished. So, if the moral code is right/wrong, surely moral and immoral actions exceed instinctual aspects? Are they even the main aspect? I am not sure To the second thing. "Morality is learnt". I do still stand by that statement. Wherever we live, there will be a huge and complicated "right and wrong" system and we have to learn it. What is right in one place, is wrong in another. Just take the English manners compared to American ones So, all in all, we do have to learn the moral codes. Few are engraved by instincts, I will admit that. Like "do not kill". However, if you want to be a "made man" in the Mafia, you have to kill someone and it is immoral not to do so, right? Some societies think killing is the right thing to do, take the death penalty. Yes, people who carry it out do feel righteous, but essentially, they are taking someone's life and going against the instincts? One other thing that doesn't quite make sense... If only an insignificant number of people murders, logic would dictate that only a small number of people get murdered, right? And that only a small number of people come personally in contact with murder. But morality is based on survival instincts and "do not kill?"? How is that possible? We talk about morals and moral morality all the time, but hardly anyone has anything to do with murder? Why? Because "moral" is much more than that. "Survival" has actually become as insignificant to "morality" as murder is to humanity. Statistically. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |